...
首页> 外文期刊>The New England journal of medicine >Temsirolimus, interferon alfa, or both for advanced renal-cell carcinoma.
【24h】

Temsirolimus, interferon alfa, or both for advanced renal-cell carcinoma.

机译:替莫罗莫司,干扰素α或两者同时用于晚期肾细胞癌。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Interferon alfa is widely used for metastatic renal-cell carcinoma but has limited efficacy and tolerability. Temsirolimus, a specific inhibitor of the mammalian target of rapamycin kinase, may benefit patients with this disease. METHODS: In this multicenter, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned 626 patients with previously untreated, poor-prognosis metastatic renal-cell carcinoma to receive 25 mg of intravenous temsirolimus weekly, 3 million U of interferon alfa (with an increase to 18 million U) subcutaneously three times weekly, or combination therapy with 15 mg of temsirolimus weekly plus 6 million U of interferon alfa three times weekly. The primary end point was overall survival in comparisons of the temsirolimus group and the combination-therapy group with the interferon group. RESULTS: Patients who received temsirolimus alone had longer overall survival (hazard ratio for death, 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58 to 0.92; P=0.008) and progression-free survival (P<0.001) than didpatients who received interferon alone. Overall survival in the combination-therapy group did not differ significantly from that in the interferon group (hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.20; P=0.70). Median overall survival times in the interferon group, the temsirolimus group, and the combination-therapy group were 7.3, 10.9, and 8.4 months, respectively. Rash, peripheral edema, hyperglycemia, and hyperlipidemia were more common in the temsirolimus group, whereas asthenia was more common in the interferon group. There were fewer patients with serious adverse events in the temsirolimus group than in the interferon group (P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: As compared with interferon alfa, temsirolimus improved overall survival among patients with metastatic renal-cell carcinoma and a poor prognosis. The addition of temsirolimus to interferon did not improve survival. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00065468 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).
机译:背景:α干扰素被广泛用于转移性肾细胞癌,但疗效和耐受性有限。 Temsirolimus是雷帕霉素激酶在哺乳动物中的一种特异抑制剂,可能会使患有这种疾病的患者受益。方法:在这项多中心,3期试验中,我们随机分配了626例先前未接受治疗,预后不良的转移性肾细胞癌患者,每周接受25 mg替莫罗莫司静脉注射,300万U干扰素阿尔法(增加至1800万U)。 )每周皮下注射3次,或每周3次与15毫克西罗莫司加600万U干扰素联合治疗。主要终点是坦西罗莫司组,联合治疗组与干扰素组的总生存期。结果:与接受干扰素治疗的患者相比,仅接受替罗莫司治疗的患者的总生存期更长(死亡危险比,0.73; 95%置信区间[CI],0.58至0.92; P = 0.008)和无进展生存期(P <0.001)。单独。联合治疗组的总生存期与干扰素组无显着差异(危险比为0.96; 95%CI为0.76至1.20; P = 0.70)。干扰素组,西罗莫司组和联合治疗组的总生存时间中位数分别为7.3、10.9和8.4个月。替西罗莫司组皮疹,外周水肿,高血糖和高脂血症更为常见,而干扰素组则乏力较弱。替莫罗莫司组中发生严重不良事件的患者少于干扰素组(P = 0.02)。结论:与干扰素α相比,替西罗莫司改善了转移性肾细胞癌和预后不良的患者的总生存率。在干扰素中添加西罗莫司不能改善生存率。 (ClinicalTrials.gov号,NCT00065468 [ClinicalTrials.gov]。)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号