首页> 外文期刊>The New England journal of medicine >Endoscopic versus surgical drainage of the pancreatic duct in chronic pancreatitis.
【24h】

Endoscopic versus surgical drainage of the pancreatic duct in chronic pancreatitis.

机译:慢性胰腺炎的胰管内镜与手术引流。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BACKGROUND: For patients with chronic pancreatitis and a dilated pancreatic duct, ductal decompression is recommended. We conducted a randomized trial to compare endoscopic and surgical drainage of the pancreatic duct. METHODS: All symptomatic patients with chronic pancreatitis and a distal obstruction of the pancreatic duct but without an inflammatory mass were eligible for the study. We randomly assigned patients to undergo endoscopic transampullary drainage of the pancreatic duct or operative pancreaticojejunostomy. The primary end point was the average Izbicki pain score during 2 years of follow-up. The secondary end points were pain relief at the end of follow-up, physical and mental health, morbidity, mortality, length of hospital stay, number of procedures undergone, and changes in pancreatic function. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients underwent randomization: 19 to endoscopic treatment (16 of whom underwent lithotripsy) and 20 to operative pancreaticojejunostomy. During the 24 months of follow-up, patients who underwent surgery, as compared with those who were treated endoscopically, had lower Izbicki pain scores (25 vs. 51, P<0.001) and better physical health summary scores on the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form General Health Survey questionnaire (P=0.003). At the end of follow-up, complete or partial pain relief was achieved in 32% of patients assigned to endoscopic drainage as compared with 75% of patients assigned to surgical drainage (P=0.007). Rates of complications, length of hospital stay, and changes in pancreatic function were similar in the two treatment groups, but patients receiving endoscopic treatment required more procedures than did patients in the surgery group (a median of eight vs. three, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical drainage of the pancreatic duct was more effective than endoscopic treatment in patients with obstruction of the pancreatic duct due to chronic pancreatitis. (Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN04572410 [controlled-trials.com].).
机译:背景:对于患有慢性胰腺炎和胰管扩张的患者,建议进行导管减压。我们进行了一项随机试验,比较内镜和手术引流胰管的情况。方法:所有有症状的慢性胰腺炎,胰管远端阻塞但无炎性肿块的患者均符合研究条件。我们随机分配患者接受内镜经胰管经壶腹引流或手术胰空肠吻合术。主要终点是随访2年的平均Izbicki疼痛评分。次要终点是随访结束时的疼痛缓解,身体和精神健康,发病率,死亡率,住院时间,经过的手术次数以及胰腺功能的变化。结果:39例患者接受了随机分组:19例接受内镜治疗(其中16例接受了碎石术),20例接受了手术的胰空肠吻合术。在随访的24个月中,与接受内镜治疗的患者相比,接受手术治疗的患者的Izbicki疼痛评分较低(25 vs. 51,P <0.001),并且在医疗结果研究中具有较好的身体健康总结评分36项目简短形式的一般健康调查问卷(P = 0.003)。随访结束时,内镜引流的患者中有32%的患者完全或部分缓解了疼痛,而手术引流的患者中则有75%的患者得到了完全缓解(P = 0.007)。两个治疗组的并发症发生率,住院时间和胰腺功能的变化相似,但是接受内镜治疗的患者比手术组的患者需要更多的手术(中位数为八对三,P <0.001) 。结论:对于因慢性胰腺炎引起的胰管阻塞的患者,胰管外科引流术比内窥镜治疗更有效。 (当前控制的试验编号,ISRCTN04572410 [control-trials.com]。)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号