...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of trauma >An analgesia-delirium-sedation protocol for critically ill trauma patients reduces ventilator days and hospital length of stay.
【24h】

An analgesia-delirium-sedation protocol for critically ill trauma patients reduces ventilator days and hospital length of stay.

机译:针对重症创伤患者的镇痛,ir妄镇静方案可减少呼吸机天数和住院时间。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Analgesics and sedatives are required to maintain a calm and comfortable mechanically ventilated injured patient. Continuous sedative infusions have been shown to lengthen mechanical ventilation and hospital length of stay. Daily interruption of sedative infusions may reduce both of these variables. Implementation of an Analgesia-Delirium-Sedation (ADS) Protocol using objective assessments with a goal of maintaining an awake and comfortable patient may obviate the need for daily interruption of infusions in critically ill trauma patients. We examined the effects of such a protocol on ventilator duration, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, hospital slength of stay, and medication requirements. METHODS: A multidisciplinary team designed the protocol. Objective measures of pain (visual/objective pain assessment scale-VAS/OPAS), agitation (Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale-RASS), and delirium [Confusion Assessment Method {CAM-ICU}] were used. Medications were titrated to a RASS of -1 to +1 and VAS/OPAS <4. Haloperidol was used to treat delirium in CAM-ICU positive patients. Retrospective review of the local Project IMPACT database for a 6-month period in 2004 was compared with the same seasonal period in 2006 in which the ADS protocol was used. All mechanically ventilated trauma patients receiving infusions of narcotic, propofol, or benzodiazepine were included. Age, APACHE II score, Injury Severity Score, ventilator days, ventilator-free days at day 28, ICU length of stay, and hospital length of stay are reported as median values (interquartile range). Medication usage is reported as mean values (+/-SD). Differences in data were analyzed using Wilcoxon's rank-sum test or t test, as appropriate. Gender, mortality, and mechanism of injury were analyzed using chi analysis. RESULTS: A total of 143 patients were included. Patients who died during their hospitalization were excluded except in the analysis of ventilator-free days at day 28. After exclusions, 61 patients were in the control group and 58 in the protocol group. The median duration of mechanical ventilation in the protocol group was 1.2 days (0.5-3.0) which was significantly reduced compared with 3.2 days (1.0-12.9) in the control group (p = 0.027). Analysis of ventilator-free days at day 28 found that the protocol group had 26.4 ventilator-free days (13.9-27.4) compared with 22.8 days (10.5-26.9) in the control group (p = 0.007). The median ICU length of stay was 5.9 days (2.3-18.2) in the control group and 4.1 days (2.5-8.3) in the protocol group (p = 0.21). Hospital length of stay was 12 days (7-17) in the protocol group in contrast to 18 days (10-27) in the control group (p = 0.036). Opiate equivalents and propofol use per patient was significantly reduced in the protocol group from 2,465 mg (+/-1,242 mg) to 1,641 mg (+/-1,250 mg) and 19,232 mg (+/-22,477 mg) to 10,057 (+/-14,616 mg), respectively (p < 0.001, p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: An objective assessment- based ADS protocol without daily interruption of medication infusion decreases ventilator days and hospital length of stay in critically ill trauma patients.
机译:背景:需要镇痛药和镇静剂以保持镇静舒适的机械通气受伤患者。连续镇静剂的输注可延长机械通气和住院时间。每天打断镇静剂可能会减少这两个变量。使用客观评估实施镇痛-镇静镇静(ADS)方案,以维持清醒和舒适的患者为目标,可以避免重症创伤患者每天中断输液的需要。我们研究了这种方案对呼吸机持续时间,重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间,医院住院时间和药物需求的影响。方法:多学科团队设计了该方案。使用客观的疼痛量度(视觉/客观疼痛评估量表-VAS / OPAS),躁动(里奇蒙镇静镇静量表-RASS)和ir妄[混淆评估方法{CAM-ICU}]。药物的滴定度为-1至+1的RASS,VAS / OPAS <4。氟哌啶醇用于治疗CAM-ICU阳性患者的del妄。将2004年6个月的本地Project IMPACT数据库的回顾性回顾与使用ADS协议的2006年同期相比进行了比较。所有接受麻醉,丙泊酚或苯二氮卓类药物输注的机械通气创伤患者均包括在内。年龄,APACHE II评分,损伤严重程度评分,呼吸机天数,第28天无呼吸机天数,ICU住院天数和住院天数均以中位数(四分位间距)报告。药物用量报告为平均值(+/- SD)。适当地使用Wilcoxon的秩和检验或t检验分析数据差异。性别,死亡率和损伤机制通过χ2分析进行分析。结果:总共包括143例患者。除在第28天无呼吸机日的分析外,将住院期间死亡的患者排除在外。排除后,对照组为61例,方案组为58例。协议组的机械通气中位时间为1.2天(0.5-3.0),与对照组的3.2天(1.0-12.9)相比有明显减少(p = 0.027)。分析第28天的无呼吸机天数,发现协议组有26.4天的无呼吸机天数(13.9-27.4),而对照组为22.8天(10.5-26.9)(p = 0.007)。对照组中ICU的中位住院时间为5.9天(2.3-18.2),方案组为4.1天(2.5-8.3)(p = 0.21)。协议组的住院天数为12天(7-17天),而对照组为18天(10-27天)(p = 0.036)。方案组中每名患者的鸦片当量和丙泊酚使用量从2,465 mg(+/- 1,242 mg)显着降低至1,641 mg(+/- 1,250 mg)和19,232 mg(+/- 22,477 mg)降低至10,057(+/- 14,616毫克)(p <0.001,p = 0.01)。结论:基于客观评估的ADS方案无需每天中断药物输注,可以减少危重创伤患者的呼吸机天数和住院时间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号