...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery >Early surgical treatment for infective endocarditis: Does it come at the expense of worse neurologic outcomes?
【24h】

Early surgical treatment for infective endocarditis: Does it come at the expense of worse neurologic outcomes?

机译:感染性心内膜炎的早期外科治疗:是否以恶化神经系统预后为代价?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

With much interest we read the recent article of Funakoshi and colleagues,1 suggesting superior long-term outcomes for patients with infective endocarditis after early surgical treatment relative to a purported conventional treatment strategy. Although the results seem in line with general consensus, several meth-odologic issues arise, affecting the validity of the study's conclusions. First, we would like to comment on the definition of the study groups. The conventional treatment group includes patients who have been treated with antibiotics only, as well as patients who have been operated on at a later stage. In our opinion, these patients should not be combined into a single treatment group. To illustrate this, the in-hospital mortality is 5% for both the early and late surgical groups.
机译:我们非常感兴趣地阅读了Funakoshi及其同事的最新文章,[1]提出了相对于声称的常规治疗策略而言,早期外科手术治疗后感染性心内膜炎患者的长期疗效更高。尽管结果似乎与一般共识一致,但还是出现了一些方法问题,从而影响了研究结论的有效性。首先,我们想评论一下研究组的定义。常规治疗组包括仅接受抗生素治疗的患者,以及后来接受手术的患者。我们认为,这些患者不应合并为一个治疗组。为了说明这一点,早期和晚期手术组的院内死亡率均为5%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号