首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery >Neurocognitive and neuroanatomic changes after off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: long-term follow-up of a randomized trial.
【24h】

Neurocognitive and neuroanatomic changes after off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: long-term follow-up of a randomized trial.

机译:体外循环与体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术后的神经认知和神经解剖学变化:一项随机试验的长期随访。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: It is unknown whether avoidance of cardiopulmonary bypass during coronary artery bypass grafting affects cerebral injury or long-term neuropsychological function. METHODS: Two hundred unselected patients were randomized to off-pump coronary artery bypass or on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting between March 2000 and August 2001. One hundred sixty-eight patients had early postoperative brain magnetic resonance imaging. Eighty-seven returned after a mean of 7.5 years of follow-up; 67 had repeat magnetic resonance imaging, and 76 had neuropsychological testing. RESULTS: There were 26 deaths among patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass and 31 among patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass as of March 2009. Seventy-six patients (41 undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass and 35 undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass) had neuropsychological testing at late follow-up. Groups were similar in age, sex, depression, and IQ. Patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass showed better attention, performing better at tracking and mentally manipulating information (P =.011). Patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass demonstrated better cognitive reasoning and made fewer errors in reasoning (P = .05); they also showed a trend toward better verbal learning (P = .064). There were no domains in which patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass outperformed those undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass. Early magnetic resonance imaging in 168 patients showed no significant differences between groups in temporal or frontal lobe atrophy, subcortical white matter lesions, or acute infarctions. There were no significant differences between groups in atrophy over time or new subcortical white matter lesions or infarctions. Acute perioperative cerebral infarctions were more common and atrophy more progressive during follow-up among diabetic than nondiabetic patients. CONCLUSIONS: After a mean of 7.5 years of follow-up, patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass performed better than those undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass in several neuropsychological domains; these differences were small and of uncertain clinical importance. Early brain magnetic resonance imaging showed no significant differences in acute cerebral infarctions between the off-pump coronary artery bypass and cardiopulmonary bypass groups.
机译:目的:在冠状动脉搭桥术中避免体外循环是否会影响脑损伤或长期的神经心理学功能尚不清楚。方法:2000年3月至2001年8月之间,将200例未选择的患者随机分为非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术或非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术。168例患者在术后早期进行了脑磁共振成像。经过平均7.5年的随访,有87位患者返回。 67例进行了重复磁共振成像,76例进行了神经心理学测试。结果:截至2009年3月,接受非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术的患者中有26例死亡,经历体外循环的患者中有31例。76例患者(其中41例经历了体外循环和35例非体外循环冠状动脉旁路化)在后期跟进。年龄,性别,抑郁和智商各异。接受非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术的患者表现出更好的注意力,在跟踪和心理操纵信息方面表现更好(P = .011)。进行非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术的患者表现出更好的认知推理能力,并且推理错误更少(P = .05);他们还表现出了更好的语言学习趋势(P = .064)。没有哪个领域的心肺旁路手术患者优于非体外循环冠状动脉旁路手术患者。 168例患者的早期磁共振成像显示,颞叶或额叶萎缩,皮质下白质病变或急性梗死在两组之间无显着差异。随着时间的推移,两组之间的萎缩或新的皮质下白质病变或梗塞之间无显着差异。与非糖尿病患者相比,糖尿病患者在随访过程中急性脑梗死更为常见,萎缩更为严重。结论:在平均7.5年的随访之后,在几个神经心理学领域中,进行体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术的患者的表现均优于进行体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术的患者。这些差异很小,临床意义不确定。早期脑磁共振成像显示,非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术和体外循环组之间的急性脑梗死没有显着差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号