首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Urology >Comparison of 3 surgical approaches to laparoscopic adrenalectomy: a nonrandomized, background matched analysis.
【24h】

Comparison of 3 surgical approaches to laparoscopic adrenalectomy: a nonrandomized, background matched analysis.

机译:腹腔镜肾上腺切除术的3种手术方法的比较:非随机背景匹配分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

PURPOSE: To clarify the characteristics of surgical approaches to laparoscopic adrenalectomy we performed background matched analysis of clinical outcomes of the 3 approaches. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From February 1992 to July 2000 we performed 118 laparoscopic adrenalectomies in 115 patients with adrenal tumors. For these operations we used the anterior transperitoneal approach in 46 patients, the lateral transperitoneal approach in 32 and the lateral retroperitoneal approach in 40. RESULTS: To exclude the learning curve effect we eliminated our initial 20 patients treated with the anterior transperitoneal approach. To allow background matching of the 3 groups we also excluded 14 patients with tumors more than 5 cm., 6 who underwent conversion to open surgery and 1 patient who required 5 days of bed rest for retroperitoneal hematoma caused by bleeding from a trocar port. The final analysis included 16, 25 and 36 cases managed via the anterior transperitoneal, lateral transperitoneal and lateral retroperitoneal approach, respectively. Average operative time was significantly shorter for the lateral transperitoneal approach. Postoperative recovery was not significantly different in the lateral transperitoneal and lateral retroperitoneal groups. Postoperative complications included mild paralytic ileus in 2 patients and shoulder tip pain, probably peritoneal irritation due to carbon dioxide insufflation and bowel preparation, in 4 in the transperitoneal groups. Our results imply that the easiest procedure is the lateral transperitoneal approach but the lateral retroperitoneal approach is slightly less invasive. CONCLUSIONS: Although it is important to remember that this study was not a prospective randomized trial and, thus, had from certain biases, we believe that if a tumor is more than 5 cm. and/or the surgeon is not yet skilled in laparoscopic adrenalectomy, the lateral transperitoneal approach is the most suitable method. If the surgeon has performed at least 20 operations, the adrenal tumor is unilateral and the lesion is less than 5 cm., the lateral retroperitoneal approach seems to be more suitable because of its minimally invasive nature. The lateral retroperitoneal approach is also preferred in patients with a history of upper abdominal surgery. With improvements in technique and new instruments the time required for the lateral retroperitoneal approach has been significantly decreased.
机译:目的:为了阐明腹腔镜肾上腺切除术手术方法的特点,我们对这三种方法的临床结果进行了背景匹配分析。材料与方法:从1992年2月至2000年7月,我们对115例肾上腺肿瘤患者进行了118例腹腔镜肾上腺切除术。对于这些手术,我们采用前腹膜后入路46例,外侧经腹膜入路32例,外侧腹膜后入路40例。结果:为排除学习曲线效应,我们消除了最初采用腹膜前入路治疗的20例患者。为了使3组的背景匹配,我们还排除了14例肿瘤超过5厘米的患者,6例接受了开放手术的患者和1例需要5天卧床休息以治疗因套管针端口出血引起的腹膜后血肿的患者。最终分析包括分别通过前腹膜后,侧腹膜后和腹膜后腹膜入路处理的16、25和36例病例。经腹膜外侧入路的平均手术时间明显缩短。腹膜外侧组和腹膜后外侧组的术后恢复无显着差异。术后并发症包括2例患者中有2例出现轻度麻痹性肠梗阻和肩尖疼痛,可能是由于二氧化碳吹入和肠道准备而引起的腹膜刺激(在腹膜组中有4例)。我们的结果表明,最简单的手术方法是腹膜后外侧入路,但腹膜后外侧入路的侵入性稍差。结论:尽管重要的是要记住,该研究不是一项前瞻性随机试验,因此存在一定的偏见,但我们认为如果肿瘤大于5厘米。和/或外科医生尚不具备腹腔镜肾上腺切除术的技能,腹膜外侧入路是最合适的方法。如果外科医生至少进行了20次手术,则肾上腺肿瘤为单侧且病变小于5厘米,则腹膜后外侧入路由于其微创性质而似乎更为合适。有上腹部手术史的患者也首选腹膜后外侧入路。随着技术和新仪器的改进,腹膜后外侧入路所需的时间已大大减少。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号