...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Urology >A prospective study of transperineal prostatic block for transurethral needle ablation for benign prostatic hyperplasia: the Emory University Experience (see comments)
【24h】

A prospective study of transperineal prostatic block for transurethral needle ablation for benign prostatic hyperplasia: the Emory University Experience (see comments)

机译:经会阴前列腺阻滞用于经尿道前列腺良性增生的经尿道针头消融的前瞻性研究:埃默里大学经验(见评论)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

PURPOSE: We evaluate the feasibility, effectiveness and role of transperineal prostate block in providing anesthesia during minimally invasive radio frequency thermal therapy of the prostate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 38 consecutive patients undergoing transurethral needle ablation for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia were entered in this prospective study. All patients received transperineal prostatic block as the main method of anesthesia. A mixture of equal volumes of 1% lidocaine and 0.25% bupivacaine, each with epinephrine (1:100,000 concentration ratio) was used. Pain control during the instillation of transperineal prostatic block and transurethral needle ablation was assessed using a 10-point linear analog pain scale and questionnaire. RESULTS: Median patient age was 65.5 years (range 47 to 79), with 21% of men in the eighth decade of life. Median American Urological Association symptom score was 25.0 (range 14 to 35), bother score was 20.0 (11 to 28), quality of life score was 4.0 (3 to 6) and peak urinary flow rate was 8.9 cc per second (3.5 to 15.7). Median sonographic prostate volume was 35.0 cc (range 17 to 129). Median volume of anesthetic agent used was 40.0 cc (range 30 to 60) per case (1.1 cc solution per 1 cc prostate tissue). No adverse events were encountered. Median pain score was 3.3 (range 1 to 6) during instillation of transperineal prostatic block and 1.0 (0 to 6) during transurethral needle ablation. Transperineal prostatic block proved highly effective and was a satisfactory method of anesthesia during transurethral needle ablation as judged by postoperative questionnaire. No sedation, narcotic or analgesia was required. All procedures were performed in the outpatient cystoscopy suite or office setting without support of an anesthesia team or conscious sedation monitoring. CONCLUSIONS: Transperineal prostatic block is a safe, convenient, effective and satisfactory method of minimally invasive anesthesia for transurethral needle ablation of the prostate in an outpatient office setting. Elderly patients and those at high surgical risk can be treated safely using this approach. Considerable cost saving is seen secondary to omission of charges related to anesthesia team support, recovery room facility and conscious sedation monitoring.
机译:目的:我们评估经会阴前列腺阻滞在前列腺微创射频热疗期间提供麻醉的可行性,有效性和作用。材料与方法:本研究共纳入38例因症状性良性前列腺增生而接受经尿道穿刺消融的患者。所有患者均接受经会阴前列腺阻滞作为麻醉的主要方法。使用等体积的1%利多卡因和0.25%布比卡因的混合物,每种混合物均带有肾上腺素(1:100,000的浓​​度比)。使用10点线性模拟疼痛量表和问卷调查评估经会阴前列腺灌注和经尿道针头消融时的疼痛控制。结果:患者的中位年龄为65.5岁(47至79岁),在生命的八十年中,男性占21%。美国泌尿外科协会症状评分中位数为25.0(范围14至35),困扰评分为20.0(11至28),生活质量评分为4.0(3至6),峰值尿流率为每秒8.9 cc(3.5至15.7) )。超声检查中位数前列腺体积为35.0 cc(范围为17至129)。每例使用的麻醉剂中位数为40.0 cc(30至60)(每1 cc前列腺组织有1.1 cc溶液)。没有遇到不良事件。滴注经会阴前列腺阻滞时中位疼痛评分为3.3(范围为1至6),经尿道针消融术期间中位疼痛评分为1.0(0至6)。经术后调查表判断,经会阴前列腺阻滞术非常有效,是经尿道穿刺消融期间麻醉的满意方法。无需镇静,麻醉或镇痛。所有程序均在门诊膀胱镜检查套件或办公室环境中进行,而无麻醉小组或有意识的镇静监测的支持。结论:在会诊时,经会阴前列腺阻滞是一种安全,方便,有效和令人满意的微创麻醉方法,用于经尿道前列腺电针消融术。使用这种方法可以安全地治疗老年患者和高手术风险患者。由于省略了与麻醉小组支持,恢复室设施和有意识的镇静监测有关的费用,因此可以节省大量成本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号