Catheter-free endoscopic laser ablation of the prostate using a 1-size prostatic stent (see comments)

摘要

PURPOSE: Endoscopic laser ablation of the prostate is a safe alternative to transurethral prostatic resection. Recognized disadvantages include prolonged catheterization, postoperative discomfort and delayed symptomatic improvement. We assessed the role of a 1-size temporary prostatic stent in men undergoing endoscopic laser ablation of the prostate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 55 men a mean of 73 years old with outflow obstruction, including 9 who presented in urinary retention, underwent endoscopic laser ablation of the prostate and temporary stenting. Urinary flow rate, residual urine volume, symptom score and prostate specific antigen were measured preoperatively, and 6 weeks (with the stent in situ), 3 months (after stent removal) and 12 months postoperatively. Duration of hospital stay and complications were also recorded. RESULTS: Of the 55 men 37 (67%) voided immediately with the stent in situ, including 7 of the 9 in retention. At 6 weeks with the stent in place mean maximum urine flow was 17.3 ml. per second (preoperatively 8.7). Dysuria was reported by 3 patients. Stent related complications were rare. One stent migrated early, resulting in urinary retention, while 2 that migrated late were asymptomatic. No patient had acute urinary retention after stent removal. Maximum urinary flow rate measured at 6 weeks with the stent in situ was similar to that 1 year after endoscopic laser ablation of the prostate. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a 1-size, inexpensive plastic prostatic stent enabled catheter-free endoscopic laser ablation of the prostate in 67% of our patients. Early improvements in the urinary flow rate and a lower incidence of dysuria were additional benefits. The result of endoscopic laser ablation of the prostate at 1 year was comparable to that of transurethral prostatic resection.