首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Urology >Sacral nerve stimulation for treatment of refractory urinary urge incontinence. Sacral Nerve Stimulation Study Group.
【24h】

Sacral nerve stimulation for treatment of refractory urinary urge incontinence. Sacral Nerve Stimulation Study Group.

机译:stimulation神经刺激治疗难治性尿急迫性尿失禁。 ac神经刺激研究组。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: A prospective, randomized study was performed to evaluate sacral nerve stimulation for the treatment of refractory urinary urge incontinence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Primary outcome variables were obtained from voiding diaries. After baseline evaluation candidates who satisfied inclusion criteria were enrolled into the study. Test stimulation results determined eligibility for randomization into a stimulation (treatment) or delay (control) group. The stimulation group included 34 patients who underwent implantation and were followed for 6 months. The delay group comprised 42 patients who received standard medical therapy for 6 months and then were offered implantation. The stimulation group completed a therapy evaluation test (on versus off) after 6 months. RESULTS: At 6 months the number of daily incontinence episodes, severity of episodes and absorbent pads or diapers replaced daily due to incontinence were significantly reduced in the stimulation compared to the delay group (all p<0.0001). Of the 34 stimulation group patients 16 (47%) were completely dry and an additional 10 (29%) demonstrated a greater than 50% reduction in incontinence episodes 6 months after implantation. Efficacy appeared to be sustained for 18 months. During the therapy evaluation test the group returned to baseline levels of incontinence when stimulation was inactivated. Urodynamic testing confirmed that sacral nerve stimulation did not adversely affect voiding function. Complications included implantable pulse generator site pain in 15.9% of the patients, implant site pain in 19.1% and lead migration in 7.0%. Surgical revision was required in 32.5% of patients with implants to resolve a complication. There were no reports of permanent injury or nerve damage. CONCLUSIONS: Sacral nerve stimulation is safe and effective in treating refractory urinary urge incontinence.
机译:目的:进行一项前瞻性随机研究以评估stimulation神经刺激治疗难治性尿急失禁的疗效。材料与方法:主要结果变量来自无效日记。进行基线评估后,符合入选标准的候选人被纳入研究。测试刺激结果确定了随机分为刺激(治疗)组或延迟(对照组)组的资格。刺激组包括34名接受植入的患者,并随访了6个月。延迟组包括42名患者,他们接受了6个月的标准药物治疗,然后被植入。刺激组在6个月后完成了治疗评估测试(打开或关闭)。结果:与延迟治疗组相比,在刺激后的6个月中,每天因尿失禁引起的尿失禁发作次数,发作的严重程度以及每天更换的尿垫或尿布的数量均显着减少(所有p <0.0001)。在34个刺激组的患者中,有16个(47%)完全干燥,另外10个(29%)植入后6个月尿失禁发作减少了50%以上。疗效似乎可以持续18个月。在治疗评估测试中,停用刺激后,该组恢复到失禁的基线水平。尿动力学测试证实神经刺激不会对排尿功能产生不利影响。并发症包括15.9%的患者植入式脉冲发生器部位疼痛,19.1%的植入部位疼痛和7.0%的铅迁移。 32.5%的植入物患者需要手术矫正以解决并发症。没有永久受伤或神经损伤的报道。结论:stimulation神经刺激治疗难治性尿急迫性尿失禁是安全有效的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号