...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Urology >In vitro assessment of a novel dual probe ultrasonic intracorporeal lithotriptor.
【24h】

In vitro assessment of a novel dual probe ultrasonic intracorporeal lithotriptor.

机译:新型双探针超声体内碎石仪的体外评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: The Cyberwand (Cybersonics, Erie, Pennsylvania) is a novel intracorporeal lithotrite that uses coaxial ultrasonic elements operating at 2 frequencies. We compared this device to the LithoClast(R) Ultra, which we previously noted is the most efficient commercially available intracorporeal lithotripsy device. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An in vitro test system was used to assess the efficiency of stone penetration for the Cyberwand and the LithoClast Ultra. The devices were mounted upright with the probe tip up in a modified irrigation sheath. A gypsum artificial stone was centered on the probe tip and a mass was placed atop the stone to provide a constant force. The manufacturer recommended setting was selected for the Cyberwand, while for the LithoClast Ultra a pneumatic frequency of 12 Hz with an ultrasonic power setting of 100% was selected, representing optimal settings in previous in vitro tests. The time required for complete stone penetration was measured. Differences in mean stone penetration times were compared using ANOVA. RESULTS: Mean +/- SD penetration time for the Cyberwand was significantly shorter than for the LithoClast Ultra (4.8 +/- 0.6 vs 8.1 +/- 0.6 seconds, p <0.0001). Neither device showed any difficulties with overheating, occlusion or another malfunction. CONCLUSIONS: Initial assessment using our hands-free in vitro test system, in which stone penetration time is not affected by operator bias, suggests that the Cyberwand is an efficient lithotrite. These promising results justify in vivo testing.
机译:目的:Cyber​​wand(Cyber​​sonics,伊利,宾夕法尼亚州)是一种新颖的体内锂铁矿,它使用以2个频率运行的同轴超声元件。我们将该设备与LithoClast®Ultra进行了比较,我们之前已经提到它是最有效的市售体内碎石术设备。材料与方法:使用体外测试系统评估Cyber​​wand和LithoClast Ultra的结石穿透效率。将设备垂直安装,使探头尖端位于改良的灌溉套管中。石膏人造石在探针尖端居中,将重物放在石顶上以提供恒定的力。为Cyber​​wand选择了制造商推荐的设置,而为LithoClast Ultra选择了12 Hz的气动频率,超声功率设置为100%,这代表了先前的体外测试中的最佳设置。测量完成石头渗透所需的时间。使用方差分析比较平均石头穿透时间的差异。结果:Cyber​​wand的平均+/- SD穿透时间明显短于LithoClast Ultra(4.8 +/- 0.6 vs 8.1 +/- 0.6秒,p <0.0001)。两种设备均未显示出过热,阻塞或其他故障的任何困难。结论:使用我们的免提体外测试系统进行的初步评估表明,射入石头的时间不受操作者偏见的影响,因此Cyber​​wand是一种有效的锂铁矿。这些有希望的结果证明了体内测试的合理性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号