首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Urology >Neural network using combined urine nuclear matrix protein-22, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 and urinary intercellular adhesion molecule-1 to detect bladder cancer.
【24h】

Neural network using combined urine nuclear matrix protein-22, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 and urinary intercellular adhesion molecule-1 to detect bladder cancer.

机译:使用组合的尿核基质蛋白22,单核细胞趋化蛋白1和尿细胞间粘附分子1的神经网络来检测膀胱癌。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

PURPOSE :We developed a neural network to identify patients with bladder cancer more effectively than hematuria and cytology. The algorithm is based on combined urine levels of nuclear matrix protein-22, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 and urinary intercellular adhesion molecule-1. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized double-blinded study of voided urine from 253 patients undergoing outpatient cystoscopy was performed. Of the patients 27 had bladder cancer on biopsy and 5 had muscle invasion. Urine tumor markers were measured using sandwich-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits. Urine from patients with bladder cancer on cystoscopy was compared to urine from controls with negative cystoscopy results. An algorithm was created with 3 sets of cutoff values modeled to be 100% sensitive for superficial bladder cancer, 100% specific for superficial cancer and 100% specific for muscle invasive cancer, respectively. We compared our model to hematuria and cytology. RESULTS: For the hematuria dipstick test sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were 92.6%, 51.8%, 18.7% and 98.2%, respectively. For atypical cytology sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were 66.7%, 81%, 29.5% and 95.3%, respectively. For the sensitive model set sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were 100%, 75.7%, 32.9% and 100%, respectively. For the specific model set sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were 22.2%, 100%, 100% and 91.5%, respectively. For the muscle invasive model set sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were 80%, 100%, 100% and 99.6%, respectively. The standard bladder tumor evaluation of 253 patients costs 61,054 US dollars but 36,450 US dollars using our model. CONCLUSIONS: Our algorithm is superior to conventional screening tests for bladder cancer. The model identifies patients who require cystoscopy, those with bladder cancer and those with muscle invasive disease. It provides possible savings over current screening methods. The potential loss of other information by not performing cystoscopy was not evaluated in our study.
机译:目的:我们开发了一种神经网络,可以比血尿和细胞学更有效地识别患有膀胱癌的患者。该算法基于尿液中核基质蛋白22,单核细胞趋化蛋白1和尿液细胞间粘附分子1的组合水平。材料与方法:对253名接受门诊膀胱镜检查的患者的尿液进行了一项随机双盲研究。活检中有27例患有膀胱癌,有5例患有肌肉浸润。使用夹心酶联免疫吸附测定试剂盒测量尿液肿瘤标志物。将膀胱镜检查的膀胱癌患者的尿液与膀胱镜检查结果阴性的对照组的尿液进行比较。创建了一个算法,该算法具有3组截止值,分别对浅表性膀胱癌敏感,对浅表性癌症敏感100%和对肌肉浸润性癌症敏感100%。我们将模型与血尿和细胞学进行了比较。结果:对于血尿试纸测试的敏感性,特异性,阳性和阴性预测值分别为92.6%,51.8%,18.7%和98.2%。对于非典型细胞学敏感性,特异性,阳性和阴性预测值分别为66.7%,81%,29.5%和95.3%。对于敏感性模型集的敏感性,特异性,阳性和阴性预测值分别为100%,75.7%,32.9%和100%。对于特定模型集的敏感性,特异性,阳性和阴性预测值分别为22.2%,100%,100%和91.5%。对于肌肉侵入性模型集的敏感性,特异性,阳性和阴性预测值分别为80%,100%,100%和99.6%。 253位患者的标准膀胱肿瘤评估费用为61,054美元,而使用我们的模型则为36,450美元。结论:我们的算法优于常规的膀胱癌筛查测试。该模型可识别需要进行膀胱镜检查的患者,患有膀胱癌的患者和患有肌肉浸润性疾病的患者。与当前的筛选方法相比,它可以节省成本。由于未进行膀胱镜检查而导致的其他信息的潜在损失未在我们的研究中进行评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号