首页> 外文期刊>The journal of trauma and acute care surgery >Cost-utility analysis of prehospital spine immobilization recommendations for penetrating trauma
【24h】

Cost-utility analysis of prehospital spine immobilization recommendations for penetrating trauma

机译:穿透性创伤的院前脊柱固定建议的成本-效用分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BACKGROUND: The American College of Surgeons' Committee on Trauma's recent prehospital trauma life support recommendations against prehospital spine immobilization (PHSI) after penetrating trauma are based on a low incidence of unstable spine injuries after penetrating injuries. However, given the chronic and costly nature of devastating spine injuries, the cost-utility of PHSI is unclear. Our hypothesis was that the cost-utility of PHSI in penetrating trauma precludes routine use of this prevention strategy. METHODS: A Markov model based cost-utility analysis was performed from a society perspective of a hypothetical cohort of 20-year-old males presenting with penetrating trauma and transported to a US hospital. The analysis compared PHSI with observation alone. The probabilities of spine injuries, costs (US 2010 dollars), and utility of the two groups were derived from published studies and public data. Incremental effectiveness was measured in quality-adjusted life-years. Subset analyses of isolated head and neck injuries as well as sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the strength of the recommendations. RESULTS: Only 0.2% of penetrating trauma produced unstable spine injury, and only 7.4% of the patients with unstable spine injury who underwent spine stabilization had neurologic improvement. The total lifetime per-patient cost was $930,446 for the PHSI group versus $929,883 for the nonimmobilization group, with no difference in overall quality-adjusted life-years. Subset analysis demonstrated that PHSI for patients with isolated head or neck injuries provided equivocal benefit over nonimmobilization. CONCLUSION: PHSI was not cost-effective for patients with torso or extremity penetrating trauma. Despite increased incidence of unstable spine injures produced by penetrating head or neck injuries, the cost-benefit of PHSI in these patients is equivocal, and further studies may be needed before omitting PHSI in patients with penetrating head and neck injuries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Economic and value-based evaluation, level II.
机译:背景:美国外科医生学院创伤委员会最近对穿透性创伤后院前脊柱固定(PHSI)的生命支持建议,是基于穿透性损伤后不稳定的脊柱损伤发生率较低。但是,鉴于毁灭性脊柱损伤的长期性和昂贵性,PHSI的成本效用尚不清楚。我们的假设是,PHSI在穿透创伤中的成本效用排除了这种预防策略的常规使用。方法:从社会的角度进行了基于马尔可夫模型的成本-效用分析,该假设是一个假设队列中的20岁男性出现穿透性创伤并将其运送到美国一家医院。分析将PHSI与单独观察进行了比较。两组的脊柱受伤概率,成本(2010年美元)和效用均来自已发表的研究和公共数据。增量有效性以质量调整生命年为单位。对孤立的头部和颈部受伤进行子集分析以及敏感性分析,以评估建议的强度。结果:只有0.2%的穿透性创伤造成不稳定的脊柱损伤,并且只有7.4%的不稳定脊柱损伤的患者经过脊柱稳定后神经功能得到改善。 PHSI组每位患者的总终生费用为930,446美元,而非固定组为929,883美元,总体质量调整生命年没有差异。子集分析表明,对于单纯性头部或颈部受伤的患者,PHSI优于非固定治疗。结论:PHSI对于躯干或四肢穿透性创伤患者而言并不具有成本效益。尽管穿透性头部或颈部受伤导致不稳定的脊柱损伤的发生率增加,但是这些患者中PHSI的成本效益是模棱两可的,在穿透性头部和颈部损伤的患者中省略PHSI可能需要进一步的研究。证据级别:经济和基于价值的评估,第二级。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号