...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry >Retentive force and magnetic flux leakage of magnetic attachment in various keeper and magnetic assembly combinations.
【24h】

Retentive force and magnetic flux leakage of magnetic attachment in various keeper and magnetic assembly combinations.

机译:各种保持器和磁性组件组合中磁性附件的保持力和磁通量泄漏。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Magnetic attachments are commonly used for overdentures. However, it can be difficult to identify and provide the same type and size of magnetic assembly and keeper if a repair becomes necessary. Therefore, the size and type may not match. PURPOSE: This study evaluated the retentive force and magnetic flux strength and leakage of magnetic attachments in different combinations of keepers and magnetic assemblies. MATERIAL AND METHODS: For 6 magnet-keeper combinations using 4 sizes of magnets (GIGAUSS D400, D600, D800, and D1000) (n=5), retentive force was measured 5 times at a crosshead speed of 5 mm/min in a universal testing machine. Magnetic flux strength was measured using a Hall Effect Gaussmeter. Data were statistically analyzed using a 1-way ANOVA, and between-group differences were analyzed with Tukey's HSD post hoc test (alpha=.05). RESULTS: The mean retentive force of the same-size magnet-keeper combinations was 3.2 N for GIGAUSS D400 and 5.1 N for GIGAUSS D600, but was significantly reduced when using larger magnets (P<.05). Magnetic flux leakage was significantly lower for corresponding size combinations. CONCLUSIONS: Size differences influence the retentive force and magnetic flux strength of magnetic attachments. Retentive force decreased due to the closed field structure becoming incomplete and due to magnetic field leakage.
机译:问题陈述:磁性附件通常用于覆盖义齿。但是,如果需要维修,可能很难识别并提供相同类型和尺寸的磁性组件和保持器。因此,大小和类型可能不匹配。目的:本研究评估了保持器和磁性组件的不同组合的保持力,磁通强度和磁性附件的泄漏。材料和方法:对于使用4种尺寸的磁体(GIGAUSS D400,D600,D800和D1000)(n = 5)的6种磁体保持器组合,在十字头上以5 mm / min的十字头速度测量了5次保持力测试机。使用霍尔效应高斯计测量磁通强度。使用1向ANOVA对数据进行统计分析,并使用Tukey HSD事后检验(alpha = .05)分析组间差异。结果:相同大小的磁铁保持器组合的平均保持力对于GIGAUSS D400为3.2 N,对于GIGAUSS D600为5.1 N,但使用较大的磁体时,其平均保持力显着降低(P <.05)。对于相应尺寸的组合,磁通量泄漏显着降低。结论:大小差异影响磁性附件的保持力和磁通强度。由于闭合磁场结构变得不完整以及由于磁场泄漏,保持力降低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号