首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry >Tensile bond strength of acrylic resin denture teeth to a microwave- or heat-processed denture base.
【24h】

Tensile bond strength of acrylic resin denture teeth to a microwave- or heat-processed denture base.

机译:丙烯酸树脂义齿对微波或热处理义齿基托的拉伸粘结强度。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Statement of Problem. Fracture of acrylic resin prosthetic teeth from acrylic resin denture bases can be a problem for some patients. The optimal combination of acrylic resin denture tooth, denture base material, and processing method is not known. Purpose. The objective of this study was to compare the tensile bond strengths of heat- and microwave-polymerized acrylic resins among 4 types of acrylic resin denture teeth. Material and Methods. Heat-polymerized (Lucitone 199) and microwave-polymerized (Acron MC) acrylic resins were used. Four types of acrylic resin denture teeth (IPN, SLM, Vitapan, and SR-Orthotyp-PE) were milled to a fixed diameter according to ADA specification no. 15. Ten specimens of each tooth type were processed to each of the denture base materials according to the manufacturers' instructions. Ten additional resin control specimens without teeth also were fabricated. Specimens were thermocycled and tested for strength until fracture with a custom alignment device. Data were analyzed with analysis of variance and Duncan's multiple range test. A scanning electron microscope was used to identify adhesive and cohesive failures within debonded specimens. Results. The mean force required to fracture the specimens ranged from 5.3 +/- 3.01 to 21.6 +/- 5.2 MPa for the microwave-polymerized base and 11.2 +/- 3.0 to 39.1 +/- 5.1 MPa for the heat-polymerized base. The most common failure was cohesive within the denture tooth. With each base material, Orthotyp and IPN teeth exhibited the highest bond strengths; SLM and Orthotyp bond strengths were similar. In general, heat-polymerized groups failed cohesively within the denture base resin or the tooth, and microwave-polymerized groups failed adhesively at either the ridge lap or occlusal surface of the denture tooth. Conclusion. Within the limitations of this study, the results suggest that the type of denture base material and denture tooth selected for use may influence the tensile bond strength of the tooth to the base. Selection of more compatible combinations of base and resin teeth may reduce the number of prosthesis fractures and resultant repairs.
机译:问题陈述。对于某些患者来说,丙烯酸树脂义齿基托中的丙烯酸树脂义齿的断裂可能是一个问题。丙烯酸树脂义齿,义齿基材和加工方法的最佳组合尚不清楚。目的。这项研究的目的是比较4种类型的丙烯酸树脂假牙之间的热聚合和微波聚合丙烯酸树脂的拉伸强度。材料与方法。使用了热聚合的(Lucitone 199)和微波聚合的(Acron MC)丙烯酸树脂。根据ADA规范No.4,将四种类型的丙烯酸树脂假牙(IPN,SLM,Vitapan和SR-Orthotyp-PE)铣削至固定直径。 15.根据制造商的说明,将每种牙齿类型的十个样本加工成每种义齿基托材料。还制造了十个另外的没有牙齿的树脂对照样品。将样品热循环并测试强度,直到使用定制的对准装置使其断裂。通过方差分析和邓肯多范围检验对数据进行分析。使用扫描电子显微镜确定脱粘试样中的粘合和内聚破坏。结果。断裂样品所需的平均力对于微波聚合基体为5.3 +/- 3.01至21.6 +/- 5.2 MPa,对于热聚合基体为11.2 +/- 3.0至39.1 +/- 5.1 MPa。最常见的失败是义齿内的粘连。对于每种基础材料,Orthotyp和IPN牙齿均表现出最高的粘结强度。 SLM和Orthotyp粘合强度相似。通常,热聚合基团在义齿基料树脂或牙齿内发生内聚性破坏,而微波聚合基团在义齿的齿圈或咬合面发生粘合性破坏。结论。在本研究的范围内,结果表明义齿基托材料和选择使用的义齿牙齿的类型可能会影响牙齿与基托的拉伸粘结强度。选择基体和树脂齿更兼容的组合可以减少假体骨折的数量和减少的修复次数。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号