...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry >Variation in color between intended matched shade and fabricated shade of dental porcelain.
【24h】

Variation in color between intended matched shade and fabricated shade of dental porcelain.

机译:预期匹配的阴影和牙科瓷器的人造阴影之间的颜色差异。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Statement of Problem. The total quantifiable color difference between shade matching and shade duplication has not been investigated formally. Purpose. The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate and compare the color difference of the total color replication process and the direction of the individual color parameters for 3 dental porcelain shade-matching systems. Material and Methods. The shade of 11 porcelain master disks was determined visually and instrumentally using 3 porcelain shade-matching systems: (1) Vita Lumin/Vita VMK 68, (2) Vitapan 3D-Master/Vita Omega 900, and (3) Shofu ShadeEye-EX/Vintage Halo. Corresponding porcelain disks made of 4.5 mm opaque and 1 mm dentin porcelain were fabricated with each of the porcelain systems. The colors of the master disks and fabricated disks (CIE L(*) a(*) b(*) coordinates) were measured with a spectroradiometer with a 45 degrees /0 degrees configuration. Repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to evaluate within-group differences among the porcelain systems for the total color difference (DeltaE) and direction of the color parameters (DeltaL, Deltaa, and Deltab). The Ryan-Einot-Gabriel-Welsch multiple range test was used for post-hoc analysis (alpha=.05). Results. The largest mean DeltaE was recorded for the Vitapan 3D-Master system, which was significantly different from the other systems (P=.0024). A significant difference was found between the interaction of the different systems and the direction of color (P=.0024). The amount of change within each color parameter was dependent on the porcelain system, as well as the amount of change among the color parameters. Conclusion. Within the limitations of this study, the results suggest that reliable delivery of a properly matched restoration to existing porcelain restorations cannot be ensured regardless of the shade assessment method used (visual or computer-generated).
机译:问题陈述。阴影匹配和阴影重复之间的总可量化色差尚未正式研究。目的。这项体外研究的目的是评估和比较3种牙科瓷器阴影匹配系统的总颜色复制过程的色差以及各个颜色参数的方向。材料与方法。使用3个瓷器阴影匹配系统在视觉上和仪器上确定了11个瓷器母盘的阴影:(1)Vita Lumin / Vita VMK 68,(2)Vitapan 3D-Master / Vita Omega 900和(3)Shofu ShadeEye-EX /复古光晕。每种瓷器系统都制作了由4.5毫米不透明和1毫米牙本质瓷制成的相应瓷盘。用具有45度/ 0度配置的分光辐射计测量母盘和预制盘的颜色(CIE L(*)a(*)b(*)坐标)。方差的重复测量分析用于评估瓷器系统之间的组内差异,以求总色差(DeltaE)和颜色参数方向(DeltaL,Deltaa和Deltab)。使用Ryan-Einot-Gabriel-Welsch多范围检验进行事后分析(alpha = .05)。结果。 Vitapan 3D-Master系统记录的最大平均DeltaE,与其他系统显着不同(P = .0024)。发现不同系统的交互作用与颜色方向之间存在显着差异(P = .0024)。每个颜色参数内的变化量取决于瓷器系统以及颜色参数之间的变化量。结论。在本研究的范围内,结果表明,无论使用哪种阴影评估方法(视觉或计算机生成),都无法确保将适当匹配的修复物可靠地交付到现有的瓷器修复物中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号