...
首页> 外文期刊>The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research >Amniotic fluid volume in normal pregnancy: Comparison of two different normative datasets
【24h】

Amniotic fluid volume in normal pregnancy: Comparison of two different normative datasets

机译:正常妊娠的羊水量:两种不同规范数据集的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Aim: The aim of the present study was to compare the two normative datasets of amniotic fluid volume (AFV). Material and Methods: The similarity of the two datasets to classify AFV as oligohydramnios, normal, and polyhydramnios based on fixed cut-offs, stratified by gestational ages (<24 weeks, 24-336/7, 34-366/7, and >37 weeks, and to identify oligohydramnios/small for gestational age (SGA) and polyhydramnios/large for gestational age (LGA) was evaluated. Results: Of the 209 pregnancies assessed, the AFV was 94 ≤ 500 mL, 101 between 501 and 1999 mL, and 14 ≥ 2000 mL. The datasets were in agreement classifying the AFV as oligohydramnios, normal, and polyhydramnios in 76% of the pregnancies. Brace classified more overall patients with oligohydramnios (19%) versus Magann (3%) (P < 0.001). In term pregnancies (>37 weeks), Brace was more likely to classify pregnancies with oligohydramnios (15%) than Magann (3%) (P = 0.004). The likelihood ratio (LR) to detect oligohydramnios/SGA was greater with Magann (LR 12.9) versus Brace (LR 2.75). Conclusion: The two datasets classifyAFVdifferently in 24% of cases. Brace's dataset is more likely to categorize patients as having oligohydramnios and Magann's dataset is a more useful test for oligohydramnios/SGA identification.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是比较两个标准化的羊水量(AFV)数据集。材料和方法:这两个数据集的相似性基于固定截止值将AFV分为羊水过少,羊水过少和羊水过少(按胎龄分层(<24周,24-336 / 7、34-366 / 7和> 37周,以鉴定羊水过少/胎龄少(SGA)和羊水过少/胎龄大(LGA)。结果:在209例评估的孕妇中,AFV为94≤500 mL,在501和1999 mL之间为101 ,并且14≥2000 mL。数据集一致同意在76%的孕妇中将AFV分为羊水过少,羊水过少和羊水过少; Brace对羊水过少的整体患者(19%)进行了分类,而Magann(3%)(P <0.001 )。在足月妊娠(> 37周)中,Brace更有可能将羊水过少(15%)分类为羊水过少(3%)(P = 0.004),检测羊水过少/ SGA的可能性比(LR)更大。 Magann(LR 12.9)vs Brace(LR 2.75)。结论:两个数据集在24%o f例。 Brace的数据集更有可能将羊水过少归为患者,而Magann的数据集对于羊水过少/ SGA的鉴别则更有用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号