...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Performance Measurement: The Performance Measurement Resource >Using Brinson Attribution to Explain the Differences Between Time-Weighted (TWR) and Money-Weighted (IRR) Returns
【24h】

Using Brinson Attribution to Explain the Differences Between Time-Weighted (TWR) and Money-Weighted (IRR) Returns

机译:使用布林森归因解释时间加权(TWR)与金钱加权(IRR)收益之间的差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Stock managers and investors have historically used the time-weighted return (TWR) as the sole performance reporting measure because industry standards have endorsed the use, not to mention the fact that equity indices and benchmarks are reported on the same basis. The TWR lends itself nicely to daily priced, daily traded and liquid investments. It's not surprising that bonds are reported in the same manner. As alternative asset classes and newfangled investment structures evolved, including closed-end vehicles in private equity and venture capital, it became clear that the TWR didn't quite fit, although it is still desired by chief investment officers because one return measure is needed to aggregate performance and to compare performance across multiple asset classes.
机译:历史上,股票经理和投资者一直将时间加权收益(TWR)用作唯一的绩效报告指标,因为行业标准认可了这种用法,更不用说股票指数和基准指标是在相同基础上报告的事实。 TWR很好地适合于每日定价,每日交易和流动投资。以相同的方式报告债券也就不足为奇了。随着另类资产类别和新型投资结构的发展,包括私募股权和风险投资中的封闭式工具,很明显,TWR不太合适,尽管首席投资官仍然希望这样做,因为需要一种回报措施汇总效果并比较多个资产类别的效果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号