...
【24h】

Risk, In Light of the Recent Market Downturn

机译:鉴于近期市场低迷,风险

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Did we learn anything as a result of the severe market downturn we experienced in 2008 and 2009? We have seen countless books come out to describe various aspects of the crisis, from winners, to losers, to contributors, but what have we learned from a risk perspective? This article will briefly touch on some of the changes we've seen and comment on a couple new measures that are gaining ground. It is not intended to be an exhaustive review but rather mainly commentary, insights, and ideas. Clearly, some individuals have decided that the way we measure and manage risk is severely flawed because our measures didn't help. Taleb (2008), for example, pointed out how the Value at Risk (VaR) metric did a horrendous job, and concludes by suggesting that any attempt at predicting risk is a waste of one's time. And on LinkedIn there has been a discussion on "what will replace VaR?," thus suggesting that its days are either ending, or that at least it needs some augmentation.
机译:由于我们在2008年和2009年经历了严重的市场低迷,我们是否学到了什么?我们已经看到无数本书来描述危机的各个方面,从赢家到输家再到贡献者,但是从风险角度我们学到了什么?本文将简要介绍我们已经看到的一些变化,并对正在发展的一些新措施进行评论。它并非旨在进行详尽的评论,而主要是评论,见解和想法。显然,有些人认为我们衡量和管理风险的方式存在严重缺陷,因为我们的措施无济于事。例如,塔勒布(Taleb(2008))指出“风险价值(VaR)”度量标准是如何做的非常糟糕,并在结论中提出,任何预测风险的尝试都是在浪费时间。在LinkedIn上,已经讨论了“什么将取代VaR?”,因此表明它的时代已经结束,或者至少它需要增强。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号