...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of pediatrics >Blame Vaccine Interference, Not Neonatal Immunization, for Suboptimal Responses after Neonatal Diphtheria, Tetanus, and Acellular Pertussis Immunization
【24h】

Blame Vaccine Interference, Not Neonatal Immunization, for Suboptimal Responses after Neonatal Diphtheria, Tetanus, and Acellular Pertussis Immunization

机译:对于新生儿白喉,破伤风和无细胞百日咳疫苗免疫后的次佳反应,应指责疫苗干预(而非新生儿免疫)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Defining which mechanisms interfere with vaccine antibody responses after neonatal DTaP immunization may only be hypothesis driven, because cellular responses were not measured by Halasa et al. Such interferences were not observed in infants immunized neonatally with 2 other acellular pertussis vaccines. This could reflect differences in formulations, including a potential role of the adjuvant (aluminum hydroxide in GSK and Novartis vaccines, aluminum phosphate in Daptacel), known to affect pertussis vaccine immu-nogenicity and efficacy.
机译:定义新生儿DTaP免疫后哪些机制会干扰疫苗抗体反应可能只是假设驱动的,因为Halasa等人并未测量细胞反应。在用其他两种无细胞百日咳疫苗进行新生儿免疫的婴儿中未观察到此类干扰。这可能反映了制剂的差异,包括已知会影响百日咳疫苗免疫原性和功效的佐剂的潜在作用(GSK和Novartis疫苗中的氢氧化铝,Daptacel中的磷酸铝)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号