...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of pediatrics >Timing of patent ductus arteriosus treatment and respiratory outcome in premature infants: A double-blind randomized controlled trial
【24h】

Timing of patent ductus arteriosus treatment and respiratory outcome in premature infants: A double-blind randomized controlled trial

机译:早产儿动脉导管未闭的治疗时间和呼吸结果:一项双盲随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective: To determine whether "early" ibuprofen treatment, at the onset of subtle patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) symptoms, would improve respiratory outcome in premature infants compared with "expectant" management, with ibuprofen treatment only when the PDA becomes hemodynamically significant (HS). Study design: We conducted a randomized double-blind controlled trial of infants with gestational ages 23 to 32 weeks and birth weights 500 to 1250 g who had echocardiography for subtle PDA symptoms (metabolic acidosis, murmur, bounding pulses). Infants were then randomized to "early" treatment (blinded ibuprofen; n = 54) or "expectant management" (blinded placebo, n = 51). If the PDA became HS (pulmonary hemorrhage, hypotension, respiratory deterioration), infants received open label ibuprofen. Infants with HS PDA at enrollment were excluded from the study. Respiratory outcomes and mortality and major morbidities were determined. Results: "Early" treatment infants received ibuprofen at median age of 3 days; infants in the "expectant group" in whom HS symptoms developed (20%) received ibuprofen at median of 11 days. A total of 49% of "expectant" infants never required ibuprofen or ligation. No significant differences were found in the primary outcome (days on oxygen [O 2] during the first 28 days), death, O 2 at 36 weeks, death or O 2 at 36 weeks, intestinal perforation, surgical necrotizing enterocolitis, grades III and IV intracranial hemorrhage, periventricular leukomalacia, sepsis or retinopathy of prematurity. Conclusion: Infants with mild signs of PDA do not benefit from early PDA treatment compared with delayed treatment.
机译:目的:确定“早期”布洛芬治疗与“预期”治疗相比,在微妙的动脉导管未闭(PDA)症状发作时是否会改善早产儿的呼吸效果,仅当PDA血液动力学显着(HS)时,才使用布洛芬治疗)。研究设计:我们对胎龄为23至32周,出生体重为500至1250 g的婴儿进行了一项随机双盲对照试验,这些婴儿因超声心动图而出现了微妙的PDA症状(代谢性酸中毒,杂音,边界脉冲)。然后将婴儿随机分配为“早期”治疗(盲目布洛芬; n = 54)或“预期治疗”(盲目安慰剂,n = 51)。如果PDA变成HS(肺出血,低血压,呼吸恶化),则婴儿接受开放标签的布洛芬。纳入HS HS PDA的婴儿不纳入研究范围。确定了呼吸结果,死亡率和主要发病率。结果:“早期”治疗婴儿的中位年龄为3天,接受布洛芬治疗;出现HS症状的“预期组”婴儿(20%)在中位11天接受布洛芬治疗。总共49%的“预期”婴儿从未需要布洛芬或结扎。在主要结局(前28天吸氧[O 2]天),死亡,36周时O 2,死亡或36周时O 2,肠穿孔,外科坏死性小肠结肠炎,III级和四,颅内出血,脑室白细胞软化,败血症或早产儿视网膜病变。结论:与延迟治疗相比,患有PDA轻度症状的婴儿不能从早期PDA治疗中受益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号