首页> 外文期刊>The Annals of occupational hygiene. >Airborne exposures to monoethanolamine, glycol ethers, and benzyl alcohol during professional cleaning: A pilot study
【24h】

Airborne exposures to monoethanolamine, glycol ethers, and benzyl alcohol during professional cleaning: A pilot study

机译:在专业清洁过程中空气中暴露于单乙醇胺,乙二醇醚和苄醇的暴露:一项初步研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

A growing body of epidemiologic evidence suggests an association between exposure to cleaning products and respiratory dysfunction. Due to the lack of quantitative assessments of respiratory exposures to airborne irritants and sensitizers among professional cleaners, the culpable substances have yet to be identified. Purpose: Focusing on previously identified irritants, our aims were to determine (i) airborne concentrations of monoethanolamine (MEA), glycol ethers, and benzyl alcohol (BA) during different cleaning tasks performed by professional cleaning workers and assess their determinants; and (ii) air concentrations of formaldehyde, a known indoor air contaminant. Methods: Personal air samples were collected in 12 cleaning companies, and analyzed by conventional methods. Results: Nearly all air concentrations [MEA (n= 68), glycol ethers (n= 79), BA (n= 15), and formaldehyde (n= 45)] were far below (1/10) of the corresponding Swiss occupational exposure limits (OEL), except for ethylene glycol mono-n-butyl ether (EGBE). For butoxypropanol and BA, no OELs exist. Although only detected once, EGBE air concentrations (n= 4) were high (49.48-58.72mg m-3), and close to the Swiss OEL (49mg m -3). When substances were not noted as present in safety data sheets of cleaning products used but were measured, air concentrations showed no presence of MEA, while the glycol ethers were often present, and formaldehyde was universally detected. Exposure to MEA was affected by its amount used (P= 0.036), and spraying (P= 0.000) and exposure to butoxypropanol was affected by spraying (P= 0.007) and cross-ventilation (P= 0.000). Conclusions: Professional cleaners were found to be exposed to multiple airborne irritants at low concentrations, thus these substances should be considered in investigations of respiratory dysfunctions in the cleaning industry; especially in specialized cleaning tasks such as intensive floor cleaning.
机译:越来越多的流行病学证据表明,接触清洁产品与呼吸功能障碍之间存在关联。由于缺乏专业清洁人员对呼吸道接触空气传播的刺激物和敏化剂的暴露的定量评估,因此尚未确定可疑物质。目的:着眼于先前确定的刺激物,我们的目标是确定(i)在由专业清洁人员执行的不同清洁任务中,空气中单乙醇胺(MEA),乙二醇醚和苯甲醇(BA)的空气浓度,并评估其决定因素; (ii)已知室内空气污染物甲醛的空气浓度。方法:在12家清洁公司中收集个人空气样本,并通过常规方法进行分析。结果:几乎所有空气浓度[MEA(n = 68),乙二醇醚(n = 79),BA(n = 15)和甲醛(n = 45)]都远低于相应瑞士标准的(<1/10)职业接触限值(OEL),但乙二醇单正丁基醚(EGBE)除外。对于丁氧基丙醇和BA,不存在OEL。尽管仅检测到一次,但EGBE空气浓度(n = 4)高(49.48-58.72mg m-3),接近瑞士OEL(49mg m -3)。如果在使用的清洁产品的安全数据表中没有注明存在物质,但进行了测量,则空气浓度表明不存在MEA,而经常存在乙二醇醚,并且普遍检测到甲醛。 MEA的使用量受到其使用量的影响(P = 0.036),喷雾对其的影响(P = 0.000),而喷雾(P = 0.007)和交叉通风(P = 0.000)则影响丁氧基丙醇的暴露。结论:专业清洁剂被发现暴露于多种低浓度的空气传播刺激物,因此在清洁行业的呼吸功能障碍调查中应考虑这些物质。特别是在专门的清洁任务中,例如密集的地板清洁。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号