首页> 外文期刊>The Annals of occupational hygiene. >How safe is control banding? Integrated evaluation by comparing OELs with measurement data and using monte carlo simulation.
【24h】

How safe is control banding? Integrated evaluation by comparing OELs with measurement data and using monte carlo simulation.

机译:控制带的安全性如何?通过将OEL与测量数据进行比较并使用蒙特卡洛模拟进行综合评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The present study aims to explore the protection level that can be achieved by the German control banding (CB) tool Einfaches Massnahmenkonzept Gefahrstoffe, 'Easy-to-use workplace control scheme for hazardous substances'. The rationale of our integrated approach is based on the Bewertungsindex (BWI), which is the quotient of the exposure level and the occupational exposure limit (OEL), with BWI <1 indicating compliance. The frequency distributions of the BWI were calculated in order to reflect statistically the variability of workplace conditions. The corresponding statistical values of the frequency distributions (percentiles etc.) are interpreted as an indicator of the level of protection that is achieved. The occupational exposure data sets used in the calculation of the BWI frequency distribution were mainly collected from Bundesanstalt fur Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin field studies. The data sets taken into account were selected according to the criteria 'hazard band, exposure potential, control approach'. Such a combination is called the 'control banding scenario' (CBS). Measurement data are only available for two CBS: in the case of the CBS 'hazard band A, EPL3, CS1' the only data that are available (n = 220) relate to propane-2-ol as used in the area of offset printing. Only 0.4 % of the BWI are above 1, this indicating a high level of compliance. In the case of the CBS 'Hazard band B, EPL2, CS1', exposure data are available from screen-printing firms (n = 50), optician workshops (n = 49), and from the area of furniture production (n = 13). The frequency distributions of the BWI reveal almost no instances of values being exceeded in the three branches. In a subsequent step, a Monte Carlo Simulation was employed to explore whether the BWI frequency distributions can be generalized using a probabilistic model. The frequency distributions of the exposure levels and the OELs were used as the input data for the model. The simulation results show that the model distribution, called Modellierter Bewertungsindex distribution, can reproduce the BWI distribution if the data basis is homogeneous (data from one branch) and less correlated. In case of a heterogeneous data set (pooled data from different branches), the simulation results can be interpreted as generic statements about the attainable protection level. It was found that CB does not (at least potentially) guarantee compliance in either case. On the other hand, the generic simulation showed that compliance was high for volatile liquids used in closed systems (CBS: 'hazard band C, EPL3, CS3') and for solids in the presence of local exhaust ventilation (CBS: 'hazard band B, EPS3, CS2').
机译:本研究旨在探讨德国控制带(CB)工具Einfaches Massnahmenkonzept Gefahrstoffe可以实现的保护水平,“易于使用的有害物质工作场所控制方案”。我们采用综合方法的理由是基于Bewertungsindex(BWI),它是暴露水平与职业暴露极限(OEL)的商,BWI <1表示合规。计算BWI的频率分布是为了统计地反映工作场所条件的变化。频率分布的相应统计值(百分数等)被解释为所达到的保护级别的指标。用于计算BWI频率分布的职业暴露数据集主要来自德国联邦议院的Arbeitsschutz和Arbeitsmedizin现场研究。根据“危险带,暴露潜力,控制方法”标准选择考虑的数据集。这样的组合称为“控制带方案”(CBS)。测量数据仅适用于两个CBS:在CBS“危险带A,EPL3,CS1”的情况下,唯一可用的数据(n = 220)与胶版印刷领域中使用的丙烷-2-醇有关。 BWI中只有0.4%高于1,这表明符合性很高。对于CBS“危险等级B,EPL2,CS1”,可以从丝网印刷公司(n = 50),眼镜店(n = 49)和家具生产领域(n = 13)获得暴露数据。 )。 BWI的频率分布表明在三个分支中几乎没有超过任何值的实例。在随后的步骤中,采用了蒙特卡洛模拟来探索是否可以使用概率模型来概括BWI频率分布。暴露水平和OEL的频率分布用作模型的输入数据。仿真结果表明,如果数据基础是同质的(来自一个分支的数据)并且相关性较低,则称为Modellierter Bewertungsindex分布的模型分布可以重现BWI分布。如果是异构数据集(来自不同分支的合并数据),则模拟结果可以解释为关于可达到的保护级别的一般性陈述。发现在任何一种情况下CB都(至少潜在地)不能保证合规。另一方面,通用模拟表明,密闭系统中使用的挥发性液体(CBS:“危险带C,EPL3,CS3”)和存在局部排气通风的固体(CBS:“危险带B”)的合规性很高。 ,EPS3,CS2')。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号