...
首页> 外文期刊>The journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy >An acute bout of static stretching does not affect maximal eccentric isokinetic peak torque, the joint angle at peak torque, mean power, electromyography, or mechanomyography.
【24h】

An acute bout of static stretching does not affect maximal eccentric isokinetic peak torque, the joint angle at peak torque, mean power, electromyography, or mechanomyography.

机译:静态拉伸的急性发作不会影响最大偏心等速峰值扭矩,峰值扭矩下的关节角度,平均功率,肌电图或肌电图。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

STUDY DESIGN: Repeated-measures experimental design. OBJECTIVE: To examine the acute effects of static stretching on peak torque, the joint angle at peak torque, mean power output, and electromyographic and mechanomyographic amplitudes and mean power frequency of the vastus lateralis and rectus femoris muscles during maximal eccentric isokinetic muscle actions. BACKGROUND: A bout of static stretching may impair muscle strength during isometric and concentric muscle actions, but it is unclear how static stretching may affect eccentric force production. METHODS AND MEASURES: Fifteen men (mean +/- SD age, 23.4 +/- 2.4 years) performed maximal eccentric isokinetic muscle actions of the dominant and nondominant knee extensor muscles at 60 degrees x s(-1) and 180 degrees x s(-1) on an isokinetic dynamometer, while electromyographic and mechanomyographic amplitudes (root-mean-square) and mean power frequency were calculated for the vastus lateralis and rectus femoris muscles. Peak torque (Nm), the joint angleat peak torque (degrees), and mean power output (W) values were recorded by the dynamometer. Subsequently, the dominant lower extremity knee extensors underwent static stretching exercises, then the assessments were repeated. RESULTS: There were no stretching-related changes in peak torque, the joint angle at peak torque, mean power output, electromyographic or mechanomyographic amplitude, or mean power frequency (P > .05). However, there were expected velocity-related, limb-related, and muscle-related differences (P < or = .05) that were unrelated to the stretching intervention. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that static stretching does not affect maximal eccentric isokinetic torque or power production, nor does it change muscle activation.
机译:研究设计:重复测量实验设计。目的:研究静态拉伸对最大偏心等速肌群运动期间峰值扭矩,峰值扭矩的关节角度,平均功率输出,股外侧肌和股直肌的肌电图和肌电图振幅以及平均功率频率的急性影响。背景:一轮静态拉伸可能会在等距和同心肌肉动作期间削弱肌肉力量,但是尚不清楚静态拉伸如何影响偏心力产生。方法和措施:15名男性(平均+/- SD年龄,23.4 +/- 2.4岁)在60度xs(-1)和180度xs(-1)处进行了主要和非主要膝盖伸肌的最大离心运动。 )在等速测功机上,同时计算股外侧肌和股直肌的肌电图和机电图振幅(均方根)和平均功率频率。用测功机记录峰值扭矩(Nm),关节扭矩峰值扭矩(度)和平均功率输出(W)值。随后,对占优势的下肢膝盖伸肌进行静态拉伸运动,然后重复评估。结果:在峰值扭矩,峰值扭矩下的关节角度,平均功率输出,肌电图或肌电图幅值或平均功率频率方面,与拉伸无关的变化(P> .05)。但是,存在与拉伸干预无关的与速度相关,肢体相关和肌肉相关的差异(P <或= 0.05)。结论:这些结果表明静态拉伸不会影响最大的偏心等速扭矩或动力产生,也不会改变肌肉的激活。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号