首页> 外文期刊>The American heart journal >Do specialty cardiac hospitals have greater adherence to acute myocardial infarction and heart failure process measures? An empirical assessment using Medicare quality measures: quality of care in cardiac specialty hospitals.
【24h】

Do specialty cardiac hospitals have greater adherence to acute myocardial infarction and heart failure process measures? An empirical assessment using Medicare quality measures: quality of care in cardiac specialty hospitals.

机译:心脏专科医院对急性心肌梗塞和心力衰竭过程措施的依从性更高吗?使用Medicare质量度量进行的经验评估:心脏专科医院的护理质量。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Supporters of specialty hospitals claim these facilities provide better patient care; however, empirical data on quality of care in specialty hospitals are limited. METHODS: We used data reported to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) during 2005 to 2006 to compare the quality of care of specialty cardiac hospitals, competing general hospitals and a group of top-ranked cardiac hospitals as identified by the US News & World Report's list of "America's best cardiac hospitals" for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and heart failure (HF). The main outcome was hospital compliance with CMS performance measures, expressed as the percentage of eligible patients with AMI or HF who received guidelines-based treatment. RESULTS: The mean compliance for all 179 hospitals was 95% for AMI measures, 91% for HF measures, and 94% for all cardiac care (AMI plus HF measures). Specialty hospitals' compliance with AMI and HF guidelines (95.2% and 91.3%) was similar to that of competing general hospitals (94.7% and 90.5%), whereas top-ranked cardiac hospitals compliance with both AMI and CHF measures (96.8% and 94.1%) was higher (P < .001). In supplemental analyses, we found that 40% of specialty hospitals were ranked in the top quartile of all 179 hospitals, as compared with 22.9% of top-ranked cardiac hospitals. Conversely, 25% specialty hospitals were in the lowest quartile, as compared to 7% of top-ranked cardiac hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: Quality of care in specialty cardiac hospitals is similar to quality in competing general hospitals and top-ranked cardiac care hospitals, as measured by compliance with AMI and HF performance indicators. Quality of care appears to be slightly better for top-ranked cardiac hospitals as compared to general hospitals, but the overall performance of all hospitals is high.
机译:背景:专科医院的支持者声称,这些设施可以提供更好的患者护理。但是,有关专科医院护理质量的经验数据有限。方法:我们使用2005年至2006年间向医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)报告的数据,比较了专科心脏医院,竞争性综合医院和一组由美国新闻确定的顶级心脏医院的护理质量和《世界报道》列出的针对急性心肌梗塞(AMI)和心力衰竭(HF)的“美国最佳心脏病医院”。主要结果是医院对CMS绩效指标的依从性,表示为接受基于指南的治疗的AMI或HF合格患者的百分比。结果:全部179所医院的AMI措施的平均依从性为95%,HF措施为91%,所有心脏护理(AMI加HF措施)为94%。专科医院对AMI和HF指南的遵从性(95.2%和91.3%)与竞争性综合医院(94.7%和90.5%)相似,而顶级心脏病医院对AMI和CHF措施的遵从性(96.8%和94.1) %)更高(P <.001)。在补充分析中,我们发现,在179家医院中,有40%的专科医院排在前四分之一,而在心脏专科医院中,这一比例为22.9%。相反,25%的专科医院位于最低四分位数,而排名第一的心脏病医院为7%。结论:通过遵守AMI和HF性能指标来衡量,专科心脏医院的护理质量与竞争性综合医院和顶级心脏护理医院的质量相似。与普通医院相比,一流的心脏医院的护理质量似乎稍好一些,但是所有医院的总体绩效都很高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号