首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Nuclear Medicine >Quantification of cerebral glucose metabolic rate in mice using 18F-FDG and small-animal PET.
【24h】

Quantification of cerebral glucose metabolic rate in mice using 18F-FDG and small-animal PET.

机译:使用18F-FDG和小动物PET定量小鼠脑葡萄糖代谢率。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The aim of this study was to evaluate various methods for estimating the metabolic rate of glucose utilization in the mouse brain (cMR(glc)) using small-animal PET and reliable blood curves derived by a microfluidic blood sampler. Typical values of (18)F-FDG rate constants of normal mouse cerebral cortex were estimated and used for cMR(glc) calculations. The feasibility of using the image-derived liver time-activity curve as a surrogate input function in various quantification methods was also evaluated. METHODS: Thirteen normoglycemic C57BL/6 mice were studied. Eighteen blood samples were taken from the femoral artery by the microfluidic blood sampler. Tissue time-activity curves were derived from PET images. cMR(glc) values were calculated using 2 different input functions (one derived from the blood samples [IF(blood)] and the other from the liver time-activity curve [IF(liver)]) in various quantification methods, which included the 3-compartment (18)F-FDG model (from which the (18)F-FDG rate constants were derived), the Patlak analysis, and operational equations. The estimated cMR(glc) value based on IF(blood) and the 3-compartment model served as a standard for comparisons with the cMR(glc) values calculated by the other methods. RESULTS: The values of K(1), k(2), k(3), k(4), and K(FDG) estimated by IF(blood) and the 3-compartment model were 0.22 +/- 0.05 mL/min/g, 0.48 +/- 0.09 min(-1), 0.06 +/- 0.02 min(-1), 0.025 +/- 0.010 min(-1), and 0.024 +/- 0.007 mL/min/g, respectively. The standard cMR(glc) value was, therefore, 40.6 +/- 13.3 micromol/100 g/min (lumped constant = 0.6). No significant difference between the standard cMR(glc) and the cMR(glc) estimated by the operational equation that includes k(4) was observed. The standard cMR(glc) was also found to have strong correlations (r > 0.8) with the cMR(glc) value estimated by the use of IF(liver) in the 3-compartment model and with those estimated by the Patlak analysis (using either IF(blood) or IF(liver)). CONCLUSION: The (18)F-FDG rate constants of normal mouse cerebral cortex were determined. These values can be used in the k(4)-included operational equation to calculate cMR(glc). IF(liver) can be used to estimate cMR(glc) in most methods included in this study, with proper linear corrections applied. The validity of using the Patlak analysis for estimating cMR(glc) in mouse PET studies was also confirmed.
机译:这项研究的目的是评估使用小动物PET和微流血采样器得出的可靠血液曲线估算小鼠大脑中葡萄糖利用代谢率(cMR(glc))的各种方法。估计正常小鼠大脑皮质的(18)F-FDG速率常数的典型值,并将其用于cMR(glc)计算。还评估了在各种量化方法中使用源自图像的肝脏时间-活动曲线作为替代输入函数的可行性。方法:研究了13只正常血糖的C57BL / 6小鼠。通过微流血取样器从股动脉采集了十八份血样。组织时间-活动曲线从PET图像导出。在各种量化方法中,使用2种不同的输入函数(一种来自血样[IF(血液)],另一种来自肝脏时间-活性曲线[IF(肝脏)])计算cMR(glc)值,其中包括3房(18)F-FDG模型(从中得出(18)F-FDG速率常数),Patlak分析和运算方程式。基于IF(血液)和3室模型的估计cMR(glc)值用作与通过其他方法计算的cMR(glc)值进行比较的标准。结果:IF(血液)和三室模型估计的K(1),k(2),k(3),k(4)和K(FDG)的值为0.22 +/- 0.05 mL / min / g,0.48 +/- 0.09 min(-1),0.06 +/- 0.02 min(-1),0.025 +/- 0.010 min(-1)和0.024 +/- 0.007 mL / min / g 。因此,标准cMR(glc)值为40.6 +/- 13.3微摩尔/ 100 g / min(集总常数= 0.6)。在标准cMR(glc)与通过包括k(4)的运算方程式估算的cMR(glc)之间未观察到显着差异。还发现标准cMR(glc)与三室模型中使用IF(肝)估计的cMR(glc)值以及通过Patlak分析估计的cMR(glc)值具有很强的相关性(r> 0.8) IF(血液)或IF(肝脏))。结论:测定了正常小鼠大脑皮层的(18)F-FDG速率常数。这些值可用于包含k(4)的运算方程式中,以计算cMR(glc)。在这项研究中包括的大多数方法中,IF(肝脏)可用于估算cMR(glc),并应用适当的线性校正。还证实了在小鼠PET研究中使用Patlak分析估计cMR(glc)的有效性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号