首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience >Specificity of M and L cone inputs to receptive fields in the parvocellular pathway: random wiring with functional bias.
【24h】

Specificity of M and L cone inputs to receptive fields in the parvocellular pathway: random wiring with functional bias.

机译:M和L视锥细胞输入对细小细胞途径感受野的特异性:具有功能偏差的随机接线。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Many of the parvocellular pathway (PC) cells in primates show red-green spectral selectivity (cone opponency), but PC ganglion cells in the retina show no anatomical signs of cone selectivity. Here we asked whether responses of PC cells are compatible with "random wiring" of cone inputs. We measured long-wavelength-sensitive (L) and medium-wavelength-sensitive (M) cone inputs to PC receptive fields in the dorsal lateral geniculate of marmosets, using discrete stimuli (apertures and annuli) to achieve functional segregation of center and surround. Receptive fields between the fovea and 30 degrees eccentricity were measured. We show that, in opponent PC cells, the center is dominated by one (L or M) cone type, with normally <20% contribution from the other cone type (high "cone purity"), whereas non-opponent cells have mixed L and M cone inputs to the receptive field center. Furthermore, opponent response strength depends on the overall segregation of L and M cone inputs to center and surround rather than exclusive input from one cone type to either region. These data are consistent with random wiring. The majority of PC cells in both foveal (<8 degrees) and peripheral retina nevertheless show opponent responses. This arises because cone purity in the receptive field surround is at least as high as in the center, and the surround in nearly all opponent PC cells is dominated by the opposite cone type to that which dominates the center. These functional biases increase the proportion of opponent PC cells, but their anatomical basis is unclear.
机译:灵长类中的许多细小细胞途径(PC)细胞显示出红绿色光谱选择性(锥度对数),但视网膜中的PC神经节细胞没有显示出视锥细胞选择性的解剖学迹象。在这里,我们询问PC单元的响应是否与锥体输入的“随机接线”兼容。我们使用离散刺激(孔径和瓣环)实现中心和周围的功能分离,测量了mar猴背侧膝状肌中PC感受野的长波敏感(L)和中波敏感(M)锥输入。测量中心凹和30度偏心之间的感受野。我们显示,在对手PC细胞中,中心是由一个(L或M)锥类型主导,通常来自另一锥类型(高“锥纯度”)的贡献小于20%,而非对手细胞则具有混合L和M锥输入到感受野中心。此外,对手的响应强度取决于L和M圆锥输入到中心和环绕的整体隔离,而不是从一种圆锥类型到任一区域的排他输入。这些数据与随机接线一致。然而,中心凹(<8度)和周围视网膜中的大多数PC细胞仍显示出对手的反应。这是由于感受野周围的视锥纯度至少与中心的视锥纯度一样高,并且几乎所有相对的PC细胞的周围视锥都与中心的视锥类型相反。这些功能性偏见增加了对手PC细胞的比例,但其解剖学基础尚不清楚。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号