首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease >Split-Care Patients and Their Caregivers How Collaborative is Collaborative Care?
【24h】

Split-Care Patients and Their Caregivers How Collaborative is Collaborative Care?

机译:分开护理患者及其护理人员协同护理如何协同?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study assessed the experiences of patients receiving split-care treatment, focusing on communication between the two treating professionals and its impact on patient satisfaction. Studies have documented that for more than 20% of patients, no communication occurs between providers, and the present study provides further data. Split-care patients completed a 23-item questionnaire on SurveyMonkey via Mechanical Turk, a crowd-sourcing Website, assessing patients' split-care experiences, including whether their providers had communicated and the impact of communication on patients' satisfaction with treatment. Of respondents who knew if their providers communicated, 30% reported that no communication occurred. Similarly, 30% and 36% of respondents were never asked by their psychotherapist or psychopharmacologist, respectively, for permission to speak to the other professional. Non-communication yielded significantly lower patient satisfaction with treatment. This study replicates the high frequency of non-communication between providers of split care and has great implications for the impact of communication on treatment compliance and outcome.
机译:这项研究评估了接受分诊治疗的患者的经历,重点是两位治疗专家之间的交流及其对患者满意度的影响。研究表明,对于超过20%的患者,提供者之间没有沟通,本研究提供了进一步的数据。分散护理患者通过Mechanical Turk(一个众包网站)在SurveyMonkey上完成了一项23个项目的问卷调查,评估了患者的分散护理经验,包括其提供者是否进行过交流以及交流对患者对治疗满意度的影响。在知道其提供者是否进行过沟通的受访者中,有30%的受访者表示没有进行沟通。同样,分别有30%和36%的受访者从未接受过心理治疗师或心理药物学家的许可,无法与其他专业人员交谈。不沟通会使患者对治疗的满意度大大降低。这项研究复制了分治护理提供者之间的非沟通频率很高,并且对沟通对治疗依从性和结果的影响具有重大影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号