首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Law and Economics >Who's the Fairest in the Land? Analysis of Judge and Jury Death Penalty Decisions
【24h】

Who's the Fairest in the Land? Analysis of Judge and Jury Death Penalty Decisions

机译:谁是土地上最美丽的人?法官和陪审团死刑判决分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The fairness of the application of the death penalty has come under question in recent years, amid the growing number of minority death row inmates. In this study, the Supreme Court decision Ring v. Arizona, which changed the death penalty sentencing phase in 13 states, is used to identify the different case and defendant characteristics that affect the decision to apply the death penalty. Using data that link homicide incidents to defendant trial outcomes in states with the death penalty, estimates suggest that juries both are more likely to apply the death penalty than judges and are more influenced by the age and race of the victim and the offender. These results raise concerns over the recent shift from judicial- to jury-based sentencing in capital cases.
机译:近年来,在少数死囚犯中,死刑适用的公平性一直受到质疑。在这项研究中,最高法院的Ring v。Arizona判决改变了13个州的死刑判决阶段,用于确定影响判处死刑判决的不同案件和被告的特征。通过使用将杀人事件与死刑州的被告审判结果联系起来的数据,估计值表明,陪审团比法官都更可能适用死刑,而且受受害者和犯罪者的年龄和种族的影响更大。这些结果引起了人们对大案中最近从基于司法的判决转为基于陪审团的判决的关注。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号