首页> 外文期刊>Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture >Lessons from Structural Adjustment Programmes and their Effects in Africa
【24h】

Lessons from Structural Adjustment Programmes and their Effects in Africa

机译:结构调整方案的教训及其在非洲的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

After independence around 1960, African countries started with high hopes for rapid gro-wth and development. Whereas the initial performance was remarkable, economic development slowed in the 1970s and stagnated in the 1980s. In response, the states'attempts to reinvigorate economic growth through state-led investments and import substitution industrialisation strategies were unsuccessful. The World Bank, the International Monetary Fund and Western donors developed and advocated Structural Adjustment Programmes (SAPs), which emphasised macroeconomic stabilisation, privatisation and free market development. The SAP approach has generated considerable debate within African countries and development circles. While proponents argued that the reforms were essential and without alternatives, critics charged that SAPs paid insufficient attention to the social dimension of development and to the institutional weaknesses of developing countries. The debate continues. This paper discusses the pro and contraarguments of the debate, presents lessons learned, and draws conclusions for future policy priorities.
机译:1960年左右独立后,非洲国家开始对快速增长和发展寄予厚望。最初的表现令人瞩目,但经济发展在1970年代放缓,在1980年代停滞。作为回应,各州试图通过国家主导的投资来振兴经济增长,而进口替代工业化战略却没有成功。世界银行,国际货币基金组织和西方捐助者制定并倡导了结构调整方案,该方案强调宏观经济稳定,私有化和自由市场发展。 SAP的方法引起了非洲国家和发展界的广泛争论。支持者认为改革是必不可少的,没有其他选择,但批评家指责SAP对发展的社会层面和发展中国家的体制弱点没有给予足够的重视。辩论仍在继续。本文讨论了辩论的利弊,提出了经验教训,并为未来的政策重点提供了结论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号