首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of arthroplasty >Is Continuous Adductor Canal Block Better Than Continuous Femoral Nerve Block After Total Knee Arthroplasty? Effect on Ambulation Ability, Early Functional Recovery and Pain Control: A Randomized Controlled Trial
【24h】

Is Continuous Adductor Canal Block Better Than Continuous Femoral Nerve Block After Total Knee Arthroplasty? Effect on Ambulation Ability, Early Functional Recovery and Pain Control: A Randomized Controlled Trial

机译:全膝关节置换术后连续性引流管阻滞优于连续性股神经阻滞?对移动能力,早期功能恢复和疼痛控制的影响:随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Total knee arthroplasty is associated with intense, early post-operative pain. Femoral nerve block is known to provide optimal pain relief but reduces the strength of the quadriceps muscle and associated with the risk of falling. Adductor canal block is almost pure sensory blockade with minimal effect on quadriceps muscle strength. We prospectively randomized 100 patients in two groups' continuous adductor and femoral block group. Ambulation ability (Timed up go, 10-m walk, 30 s chair test), time to active SLR, quadsticks, staircase competency, ambulation distance was significantly better (P value < 0.001) in adductor canal group whereas pain scores, opioid consumption showed no significant difference. Adductor canal block provided better ambulation and early functional recovery but without superior analgesia than femoral nerve block post TKA. Level of evidence: Level III, therapeutic study. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:全膝关节置换术与剧烈的术后早期疼痛有关。已知股神经阻滞可提供最佳的疼痛缓解,但会降低股四头肌的力量,并伴有跌倒的风险。引流管阻滞几乎是纯粹的感觉阻滞,对股四头肌的肌力影响最小。我们前瞻性将100例患者随机分为两组,即连续内收肌和股骨阻滞组。内收管组的走动能力(定时走步,步行10米,30 s椅子测试),主动单反时间,四脚杆,楼梯能力,走动距离明显更好(P值<0.001),而疼痛评分,阿片类药物消耗量则显示无明显差异。与TKA后股神经阻滞相比,引流管阻滞提供了更好的行走功能和早期功能恢复,但没有更好的镇痛作用。证据级别:III级,治疗研究。 (C)2014 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号