首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of arthroplasty >A Comparison of Single Shot Adductor Canal Block Versus Femoral Nerve Catheter for Total Knee Arthroplasty
【24h】

A Comparison of Single Shot Adductor Canal Block Versus Femoral Nerve Catheter for Total Knee Arthroplasty

机译:单发内收管与股神经导管在全膝关节置换术中的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The aim of this study was to compare perioperative analgesia provided by single-injection adductor canal block (ACB) to continuous femoral nerve catheter (FNC) when used in a multimodal pain protocol for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A retrospective cohort study compared outcome data for 148 patients receiving a single-injection ACB to 149 patients receiving an FNC. The mean length of stay (LOS) in the ACB group was 2.67 (+/- 0.56) and 3.01 days (+/- 0.57) in the FNC group (P < 0.0001). The median ambulatory distances for the adductor group were further than the femoral group for postoperative days 1 (P < 0.0001) and 2 (P=0.01). Single-injection ACB offered similar pain control and earlier discharge compared to continuous FNC in patients undergoing TKA. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:这项研究的目的是比较在全模式膝关节置换术(TKA)的多模式疼痛方案中使用单次注射内收管阻滞(ACB)与连续股神经导管(FNC)进行的围手术期镇痛。一项回顾性队列研究比较了148例接受单次注射ACB的患者和149例接受FNC的患者的结局数据。 ACB组的平均住院时间(LOS)为2.67(+/- 0.56),而FNC组为3.01天(+/- 0.57)(P <0.0001)。术后第1天(P <0.0001)和第2天(P = 0.01),内收肌组的中位行走距离比股骨组要远。与连续FNC进行TKA的患者相比,单次注射ACB可提供相似的疼痛控制和更早出院。 (C)2015 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号