首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of arthroplasty >A comparison of wound closure techniques for total knee arthroplasty.
【24h】

A comparison of wound closure techniques for total knee arthroplasty.

机译:全膝关节置换术伤口闭合技术的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Four wound closure techniques for total knee arthroplasty were compared in a prospective, randomized, controlled, institutional review board-approved study with 75 subjects. The study compared tissue adhesives, stapling, and suturing with respect to procedure time and cost, together with functional and clinical outcome. Total knee arthroplasty closure time (capsule to cutaneous) favored staples at 26 s/cm, followed by adhesives (45 and 37 s/cm for 2-octyl and n-butyl-2, respectively) and, finally, subcuticular suturing at 54 s/cm (P < .0007). Reduced procedure time translated into intraoperative cost reduction where closure cost per centimeter was Dollars 70, Dollars 62, Dollars 57, and Dollars 75 for 2-octyl, n-butyl-2, staples, and sutures, respectively. No significant differences in infection, dehiscence, cosmesis, general health (SF-12v2 (QualityMetric Inc., Lincoln, RI)), and functional and clinical assessments (range of motion, Knee Society knee score, and pain) were observed.
机译:在一项前瞻性,随机,对照,机构审查委员会批准的研究中对75名受试者进行了比较,比较了四种用于全膝关节置换的伤口闭合技术。该研究比较了手术时间和成本以及功能和临床结果方面的组织粘合剂,缝合和缝合。膝关节置换术的总闭合时间(胶囊至皮肤)有利于吻合钉钉钉,其缝合时间为26 s / cm,其次是粘合剂(2-辛基和正丁基2分别为45和37 s / cm),最后在54 s处进行皮下缝合/厘米(P <.0007)。手术时间的减少转化为术中成本的降低,其中每厘米2-辛基,n-丁基-2,钉书钉和缝合线的闭合成本分别为70美元,62美元,57美元和75美元。在感染,开裂,整容,总体健康(SF-12v2(QualityMetric Inc.,林肯,RI))以及功能和临床评估(运动范围,Knee Society膝关节评分和疼痛)方面均未观察到显着差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号