首页> 外文期刊>The journal of clinical psychiatry >Is bipolar disorder overdiagnosed?
【24h】

Is bipolar disorder overdiagnosed?

机译:双相情感障碍是否被过度诊断?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: Bipolar disorder, a serious illness resulting in significant psychosocial morbidity and excess mortality, has been reported to be frequently underdiagnosed. However, during the past few years we have observed the emergence of an opposite phenomenon--the overdiagnosis of bipolar disorder. In the present report from the Rhode Island Methods to Improve Diagnostic Assessment and Services (MIDAS) project, we empirically examined whether bipolar disorder is overdiagnosed. METHOD: Seven hundred psychiatric outpatients were interviewed with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID) and completed a self-administered questionnaire, which asked the patients whether they had been previously diagnosed with bipolar or manic-depressive disorder by a health care professional. Family history information was obtained from the patient regarding first-degree relatives. Diagnoses were blind to the results of the self-administered scale. The study was conducted from May 2001 to March 2005. RESULTS: Fewer than half the patients who reported that they had been previously diagnosed with bipolar disorder received a diagnosis of bipolar disorder based on the SCID. Patients with SCID-diagnosed bipolar disorder had a significantly higher morbid risk of bipolar disorder than patients who self-reported a previous diagnosis of bipolar disorder that was not confirmed by the SCID (p < .02). Patients who self-reported a previous diagnosis of bipolar disorder that was not confirmed by the SCID did not have a significantly higher morbid risk for bipolar disorder than the patients who were negative for bipolar disorder by self-report and the SCID. CONCLUSIONS: Not only is there a problem with underdiagnosis of bipolar disorder, but also an equal if not greater problem exists with overdiagnosis.
机译:目的:双相情感障碍是一种严重的疾病,导致严重的社会心理疾病和高死亡率,据报道经常被诊断不足。但是,在过去的几年中,我们观察到了相反现象的出现-对躁郁症的过度诊断。在罗德岛州改善诊断评估和服务方法(MIDAS)项目的本报告中,我们根据经验检查了双相情感障碍是否被过度诊断。方法:对700名精神科门诊患者进行了DSM-IV(SCID)的结构化临床访谈,并填写了一份自我调查表,询问患者以前是否曾被医护人员诊断为躁郁症或躁狂抑郁症。从患者那里获得有关一级亲属的家族史信息。诊断对自我管理量表的结果视而不见。该研究于2001年5月至2005年3月进行。结果:少于一半的报告称先前被诊断出患有双相情感障碍的患者接受了基于SCID的双相情感障碍的诊断。与自我报告先前未被SCID证实的双相情感障碍的患者相比,具有SCID诊断的双相情感障碍的患者比双相情感障碍的患病风险显着更高(p <.02)。自我报告先前未被SCID证实的躁郁症诊断的患者,与自我报告和SCID呈阴性的躁郁症患者相比,躁郁症的发病风险没有明显更高。结论:双相情感障碍的诊断不足不仅存在问题,而且过度诊断存在同样的问题,如果不是更大的话。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号