首页> 外文期刊>The journal of clinical psychiatry >A meta-analysis of the risk of acute extrapyramidal symptoms with intramuscular antipsychotics for the treatment of agitation.
【24h】

A meta-analysis of the risk of acute extrapyramidal symptoms with intramuscular antipsychotics for the treatment of agitation.

机译:对使用肌内抗精神病药治疗急性锥体外系症状的风险进行荟萃分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: We examined the evidence for a decreased risk of extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) with intramuscular second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) versus intramuscular haloperidol alone or in combination with an anticholinergic agent. DATA SOURCES: We searched MEDLINE (1950 to the present), and EMBASE and the Cochrane Database through January 16, 2008, for studies published in English of intramuscular SGAs and intramuscular haloperidol alone or in combination with an anticholinergic agent using the following drug names: ziprasidone, Geodon, olanzapine, Zyprexa, aripiprazole, Abilify, haloperidol, and Haldol. We then searched this pool of studies for trials with the terms intramuscular, IM, or injectable. Initially, we included only randomized controlled trials (RCTs). To obtain more data comparing SGAs to the combination of haloperidol and an anticholinergic, we conducted a second analysis including studies of any methodology. STUDY SELECTION: Seven RCTs that compared intramuscular SGAs to intramuscular haloperidol alone were identified. However, we found only one RCT of haloperidol plus an anticholinergic. In the second analysis, we identified 18 studies, including 4 using haloperidol combined with promethazine (an antihistamine with anticholinergic properties). DATA EXTRACTION: The primary outcome measure was acute dystonia; secondary outcome measures included akathisia, parkinsonism, or the need for additional anticholinergic medication. For RCTs, risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for each outcome. When all studies were included in the second analysis, we calculated the risk of acute dystonia. DATA SYNTHESIS: Among RCTs (N = 2032), SGAs were associated with a significantly lower risk of acute dystonia (RR = 0.19, 95% CI = 0.10 to 0.39), akathisia (RR = 0.25, 95% CI = 0.14 to 0.44), and anticholinergic use (RR = 0.19, 95% CI = 0.09 to 0.43) compared with haloperidol alone. When all trials were considered (N = 3425), rates of acute dystonia were higher for haloperidol alone (4.7%) than for SGAs (0.6%) or for haloperidol plus promethazine (0.0%). CONCLUSIONS: Intramuscular SGAs have a significantly lower risk of acute EPS compared to haloperidol alone. However, intramuscular haloperidol plus promethazine has a risk of acute dystonia comparable to intramuscular SGAs. The decision to use SGAs should consider other factors in addition to the reduction of EPS, which can be prevented by the use of an anticholinergic agent.
机译:目的:我们研究了肌内第二代抗精神病药(SGA)与单独使用肌内氟哌啶醇或与抗胆碱能药联用的锥体外系症状(EPS)风险降低的证据。数据来源:我们搜索MEDLINE(至1950年至今),EMBASE和Cochrane数据库,直至2008年1月16日,以英文发表了肌内SGA和肌内氟哌啶醇或与抗胆碱能药联合使用的英文名称,并使用以下药物名称:齐拉西酮,Geodon,奥氮平,Zyprexa,阿立哌唑,Abilify,氟哌啶醇和Haldol。然后,我们在此研究库中搜索了肌内,IM或可注射术语的试验。最初,我们仅包括随机对照试验(RCT)。为了获得比较SGA与氟哌啶醇和抗胆碱能药物组合的更多数据,我们进行了第二次分析,包括对任何方法的研究。研究选择:确定了将肌内SGA与单独的肌内氟哌啶醇进行比较的7个RCT。但是,我们仅发现氟哌啶醇的一种RCT加抗胆碱能药。在第二项分析中,我们确定了18项研究,包括4项使用氟哌啶醇和异丙嗪(一种具有抗胆碱能特性的抗组胺药)联合使用的研究。数据提取:主要结局指标为急性肌张力障碍。次要结果指标包括静坐不足,帕金森症或需要额外的抗胆碱能药物。对于RCT,计算出每个结局的风险比(RR)和95%置信区间(CI)。当所有研究都包括在第二分析中时,我们计算了急性肌张力障碍的风险。数据综合:在RCT中(N = 2032),SGA与急性肌张力障碍(RR = 0.19,95%CI = 0.10至0.39),静坐不全(RR = 0.25,95%CI = 0.14至0.44)的风险显着降低相关与单独使用氟哌啶醇相比,抗胆碱能药的使用(RR = 0.19,95%CI = 0.09至0.43)。当考虑所有试验(N = 3425)时,单独使用氟哌啶醇的急性肌张力障碍发生率(4.7%)比使用SGAs(0.6%)或氟哌啶醇加异丙嗪的急性肌张力障碍发生率高(0.0%)。结论:与单独使用氟哌啶醇相比,肌内SGA的急性EPS风险要低得多。但是,肌内氟哌啶醇加异丙嗪具有与肌内SGA相当的急性肌张力障碍风险。使用SGA的决定除了应减少EPS之外,还应考虑其他因素,这可以通过使用抗胆碱能药物来预防。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号