...
首页> 外文期刊>The journal of clinical psychiatry >McLean-Harvard International First-Episode Project: two-year stability of ICD-10 diagnoses in 500 first-episode psychotic disorder patients.
【24h】

McLean-Harvard International First-Episode Project: two-year stability of ICD-10 diagnoses in 500 first-episode psychotic disorder patients.

机译:麦克莱恩·哈佛国际首发项目:ICD-10诊断的两年稳定性在500名首发精神病患者中进行。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: Because clinical and biologic research and optimal clinical practice require stability of diagnoses over time, we determined stability of ICD-10 psychotic disorder diagnoses and sought predictors of diagnostic instability. METHOD: Patients from the McLean-Harvard International First-Episode Project, conducted from 1989 to 2003, who were hospitalized for first psychotic illnesses (N = 500) were diagnosed by ICD-10 criteria at baseline and 24 months, on the basis of extensive prospective assessments, to evaluate the longitudinal stability of specific categorical diagnoses and predictors of diagnostic change. RESULTS: Diagnostic stability averaged 90.4%, ranking as follows: schizoaffective disorder (100.0%) > mania with psychosis (99.0%) > mixed affective episode (94.9%) > schizophrenia (94.6%) > delusional disorder (88.2%) > severe depressive episode with psychotic symptoms (85.2%) > acute psychosis with/without schizophrenia symptoms = unspecified psychosis (all 66.7%) acute schizophrenia-like psychosis (28.6%). Diagnoses changed by 24 months of follow-up to schizoaffective disorder (37.5%), bipolar disorder (25.0%), schizophrenia (16.7%), or unspecified nonorganic psychosis (8.3%), mainly through emerging affective features. By logistic regression, diagnostic change was associated with Schneiderian first-rank psychotic symptoms at intake > lack of premorbid substance use. CONCLUSIONS: We found some psychotic disorder diagnoses to be more stable by ICD-10 than DSM-IV criteria in the same patients, with implications for revisions of both diagnostic systems.
机译:目的:由于临床和生物学研究以及最佳临床实践需要随着时间的推移才能保持诊断的稳定性,因此我们确定了ICD-10精神病诊断的稳定性,并寻求诊断不稳定的指标。方法:从1989年至2003年进行的McLean-Harvard International First-Episode Project的患者中,因初发精神病(N = 500)而住院的患者在基线和24个月时根据ICD-10标准进行了广泛诊断,前瞻性评估,以评估特定类别诊断的纵向稳定性和诊断变化的预测因子。结果:诊断稳定性平均为90.4%,排名如下:分裂情感障碍(100.0%)>躁狂症伴精神病(99.0%)>混合性情感发作(94.9%)>精神分裂症(94.6%)>妄想障碍(88.2%)>严重抑郁症伴有精神病症状的发作(85.2%)>有/无精神分裂症症状的急性精神病=未明确的精神病(所有66.7%)急性精神分裂症样精神病(28.6%)。对精神分裂症(37.5%),双相情感障碍(25.0%),精神分裂症(16.7%)或未指明的非器质性精神病(8.3%)的随访24个月后,诊断主要通过新出现的情感特征而改变。通过逻辑回归分析,诊断变化与摄入>缺乏病前物质使用时的Schneiderian头等精神病症状相关。结论:我们发现在相同的患者中,ICD-10的某些精神病诊断比DSM-IV的诊断更为稳定,这暗示着两种诊断系统的修订。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号