首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Chemical Physics >Electrical response in chemical potential equalization schemes
【24h】

Electrical response in chemical potential equalization schemes

机译:化学势均等方案中的电响应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this paper we compare the polarization response given by two different chemical potential equalization schemes to be applied to molecular dynamics simulations: the standard fluctuating point charge model (FQ) and the atom-atom charge transfer model (AACT). We have tested the transferability of FQ and AACT parameters, fitted to the polarizability of small size alkanes and polyenes, to large size homologues. We show that the FQ scheme is not adequate for the n-alkanes as it strongly overestimates the polarizability tensor components as the number of carbon atoms increases. The FQ approach has been found more predictive for highly conjugated systems like polyenes, although still unsatisfactory. The AACT parameters tuned on ethane are instead perfectly transferable to alkanes of any length and conformation. The AACT scheme satisfactorily reproduces the polarization response also for highly conjugated systems.
机译:在本文中,我们比较了两种不同的化学势均等方案所给出的极化响应,这些方案将应用于分子动力学仿真:标准波动点电荷模型(FQ)和原子-原子电荷转移模型(AACT)。我们已经测试了FQ和AACT参数的可传递性,适合小尺寸烷烃和多烯的极化率,适合大尺寸的同系物。我们显示FQ方案对于正构烷烃来说是不合适的,因为随着碳原子数量的增加,它强烈地高估了极化率张量分量。尽管仍然不能令人满意,但人们发现FQ方法对于高度共轭的体系(如多烯)更具预测性。相反,在乙烷上调节的AACT参数可以完美地转移到任何长度和构象的烷烃上。对于高度共轭的系统,AACT方案也可以令人满意地重现偏振响应。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号