首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of clinical pediatric dentistry >A comparative evaluation of intrnasal dexmedetomidine, midazolam and ketamine for their sedative and analgesic properties: A triple blind randomized study
【24h】

A comparative evaluation of intrnasal dexmedetomidine, midazolam and ketamine for their sedative and analgesic properties: A triple blind randomized study

机译:鼻内右美托咪定,咪达唑仑和氯胺酮镇静和镇痛作用的比较评估:三盲随机研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives: To evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of Intranasal (IN) Dexmedetomidine, Midazolam and Ketamine in producing moderate sedation among uncooperative pediatric dental patients. Study Design: This randomized triple blind comparative study comprises of eighty four ASA grade I children of both sexes aged 4-14 years, who were uncooperative and could not be managed by conventional behavior management techniques. All the children were randomized to receive one of the four drug groups Dexmedetomidine 1?g/kg (D1), 1.5μg/kg (D2), Midazolam 0.2mg/kg (M1) and Ketamine 5mg/kg (K1) through IN route. These drug groups were assessed for efficacy and safety by gauging overall success rate and by monitoring vital signs, respectively. Results: The onset of sedation was significantly rapid with M1 and K1 as compared to D1 and D2 (p=?0.001). The overall success rate was highest in D2 (85.7%) followed by D1 (81%), K1 (66.7%) and M1 (61.9%), however, the difference among them was not statistically significant (p=?0.05). Even though all the vital signs were within physiological limits, there was significant reduction in pulse rate (PR) (p=?0.001) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) (p=?0.05) among D1 and D2 as compared to M1 and K1. D1, D2 and K1 produced greater intra-and post-operative analgesia as compared to M1. There were no significant adverse effects with any group. Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine, Midazolam and Ketamine, all the three drugs evaluated in the present study can be used safely and effectively through IN route in uncooperative pediatric dental patients for producing moderate sedation.
机译:目的:评估和比较鼻内右美托咪定,咪达唑仑和氯胺酮在不配合手术的小儿牙科患者中产生中等镇静作用的有效性和安全性。研究设计:这项随机三盲对照研究包括88位年龄在4-14岁之间的ASA I级儿童,他们不合作并且无法通过常规行为管理技术进行管理。所有儿童均通过IN途径被随机分配为4种药物组之一:右美托咪定1?g / kg(D1),1.5μg/ kg(D2),咪达唑仑0.2mg / kg(M1)和氯胺酮5mg / kg(K1) 。通过评估总体成功率和监测生命体征分别评估了这些药物组的疗效和安全性。结果:与D1和D2相比,M1和K1的镇静作用明显加快(p =?0.001)。总的成功率最高的是D2(85.7%),其次是D1(81%),K1(66.7%)和M1(61.9%),但是,两者之间的差异无统计学意义(p =?0.05)。即使所有生命体征都在生理范围内,与M1和K1相比,D1和D2之间的脉搏率(PR)(p =?0.001)和收缩压(SBP)(p =?0.05)仍显着降低。 。与M1相比,D1,D2和K1在术中和术后镇痛效果更好。任何组均无明显不良反应。结论:本研究中评估的三种药物右美托咪定,咪达唑仑和氯胺酮可通过IN途径安全有效地用于不合作的小儿牙科患者中度镇静。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号