...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of heart valve disease >Valve orifice area alone is an insufficient index of aortic stenosis severity: effects of the proximal and distal geometry on transaortic energy loss.
【24h】

Valve orifice area alone is an insufficient index of aortic stenosis severity: effects of the proximal and distal geometry on transaortic energy loss.

机译:仅瓣膜口面积是不足以表示主动脉瓣狭窄严重程度的指标:近端和远端几何形状对经主动脉能量损失的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND AND AIMS OF THE STUDY: Standard measures of hemodynamic severity of aortic valve stenosis vary widely among patients with and without clinical symptoms. Our hypothesis is that valve orifice area alone is not the sole determinant of adverse clinical outcome. Stenotic orifice area ratio is ratio of the cross-sectional stenotic orifice area to the down-stream, ascending aorta cross-sectional area. Determination of workload together with aortic valve orifice area ratio might improve risk stratification among asymptomatic patients with critical aortic stenosis. Accordingly, application of both parameters together might be useful in guiding management decisions in this condition. METHODS: In this study the dependency of transaortic fluid mechanical energy transfer (one component of left ventricular workload) on aortic valve orifice area is shown using modeling and experimental techniques. RESULTS: For a stroke volume of 62 ml at a heart rate of 60 beats/min, the piston work (analogous to left ventricular work) increased by 17% as the stenotic orifice area ratio decreased from 0.60 to 0.25, by 35% as the ratio fell from 0.25 to 0.20, and by 73% as the ratio fell from 0.20 to 0.10. CONCLUSIONS: As predicted by the fundamental fluid mechanical theory, simulated left ventricular work and energy loss in aortic stenosis are influenced not only by the effective stenotic valve orifice area, but also by the geometry of the inflow and outflow conduits, proximal and distal to the valve. These findings might explain clinically observed discrepancies between valve orifice area and the onset of the classical symptoms of severe aortic stenosis that reflect the left ventricular workload. Consideration of the left ventricular work in addition to the effective valve orifice area should enhance clinical evaluation, prognostication and risk stratification among patients with severe aortic stenosis.
机译:研究背景和目的:在有或没有临床症状的患者中,主动脉瓣狭窄的血流动力学严重程度的标准测量方法差异很大。我们的假设是,单独的瓣膜孔面积并不是不良临床结果的唯一决定因素。狭窄孔口面积比是横截面狭窄孔口面积与下游升主动脉横截面面积之比。确定工作量以及主动脉瓣口面积比可能会改善无症状重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者的危险分层。因此,在此情况下,将两个参数一起应用可能有助于指导管理决策。方法:在这项研究中,使用建模和实验技术显示了经主动脉流体机械能转移(左心室工作量的一个组成部分)对主动脉瓣口面积的依赖性。结果:对于以60次/分钟的心率搏动的62 ml搏动量,当狭窄孔口面积比从0.60降低至0.25时,活塞功(类似于左心室功)增加17%,而当比率从0.25降至0.20,下降了73%(比率从0.20降至0.10)。结论:正如基本流体力学理论所预测的那样,模拟的左心室功和主动脉瓣狭窄中的能量损失不仅受到有效的狭窄瓣膜孔面积的影响,还受到流入和流出导管近端和远端的几何形状的影响。阀。这些发现可能可以解释临床上观察到的瓣膜孔面积与反映左心室工作量的严重主动脉瓣狭窄典型症状发作之间的差异。重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者除考虑有效瓣膜孔面积外,还应考虑左心室工作,以加强临床评估,预后和风险分层。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号