首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of heart valve disease >Differences in heart valve procedures between North American and European centers: a report from the Artificial Valve Endocarditis Reduction Trial (AVERT).
【24h】

Differences in heart valve procedures between North American and European centers: a report from the Artificial Valve Endocarditis Reduction Trial (AVERT).

机译:北美和欧洲中心之间心脏瓣膜手术的差异:人工瓣膜减少心内膜炎试验(AVERT)的报告。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: Differences in heart valve procedures between North American (NA) and European (EU) centers were evaluated in a multicenter trial. METHODS: Between July 1998 and January 2000, 807 patients from 12 NA (n = 446) and seven EU centers (n = 361) were randomized to receive either Silzone or conventional valves in the Artificial Valve Endocarditis Reduction Trial (AVERT). Subanalysis was performed to compare demographics, patient risk profile, surgical techniques and perioperative management of patients in NA and EU centers. RESULTS: Mean age was significantly younger and body mass index higher in NA. Patients' risk profiles showed significantly higher incidences of previous myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, angina, prior cardiovascular surgery, and history of smoking in NA. A different distribution of implant position was observed between groups: aortic valve/mitral valve/double valve replacement in 54.0, 35.7 and 10.3% in NA, and 64.5, 27.4 and 8.0% in EU (p <0.01). Concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting was performed in 31.6% of NA patients and 19.4% of EU patients (p <0.001). Timing of surgery showed a higher incidence of urgent procedures in NA centers. Distribution of valve sizes and perioperative complication rate were similar, but length of hospital stay was longer in EU centers. CONCLUSION: Surprisingly, surgeons in NA and EU centers are faced by different patient populations requiring mechanical heart valve replacement. NA patients were younger, but required more extensive surgery. Surgical technique and perioperative management appear to differ in NA and EU centers. These differences in reporting heart valve procedures might have been influenced by variable interpretations of definitions and different patient expectations, although a uniform study protocol with consistent definitions was used at all sites.
机译:研究背景和目的:在一项多中心试验中评估了北美(NA)和欧洲(EU)中心之间心脏瓣膜手术的差异。方法:在1998年7月至2000年1月之间,来自12个NA(n = 446)和7个EU中心(n = 361)的807例患者被随机分配接受Silzone或常规瓣膜人工瓣膜减少心内膜炎试验(AVERT)。进行了亚分析,以比较北美和欧洲中心的人口统计学,患者风险状况,手术技术和围手术期管理。结果:NA的平均年龄明显年轻,体重指数较高。患者的风险状况显示,以前的心肌梗塞,充血性心力衰竭,心绞痛,先前的心血管外科手术和吸烟史均显着较高。在各组之间观察到植入物位置的不同分布:主动脉瓣/二尖瓣/双瓣置换在NA中占54.0%,35.7%和10.3%,在EU中占64.5%,27.4%和8.0%(p <0.01)。 31.6%的NA患者和19.4%的EU患者进行了冠状动脉搭桥术(p <0.001)。手术时间显示在北美中心的紧急手术发生率更高。瓣膜大小的分布和围手术期并发症发生率相似,但在欧盟中心,住院时间更长。结论:令人惊讶的是,NA和EU中心的外科医生面临着需要机械心脏瓣膜置换的不同患者人群。 NA患者较年轻,但需要更广泛的手术。在北美和欧盟中心,手术技术和围手术期处理似乎有所不同。尽管在所有场所均使用了具有一致定义的统一研究方案,但报告心脏瓣膜操作的这些差异可能已受到定义的不同解释和患者期望值不同的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号