首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Applied Poultry Research >Comparison of ingredient usage and formula costs in poultry feeds using different amino acid digestibility databases.
【24h】

Comparison of ingredient usage and formula costs in poultry feeds using different amino acid digestibility databases.

机译:使用不同的氨基酸消化率数据库比较家禽饲料中的成分使用和配方成本。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This study showed how using different database values for digestible amino acid contents influences ingredient usage and feed costs for broiler, layer, and turkey diets with recent ingredient costs from the United States and Pakistan. A series of feeds were formulated to compare results from using 2 commercial ingredient composition databases: Ajinomoto Heartland (AH; rooster assay values) and Evonik Degussa (ED; chick assay values). The ingredient composition matrix was based on NRC (1994) tables, except for digestible amino acids and protein. Requirements were for a broiler starter (Ross), broiler finisher (Cobb), turkey starter (Nicholas), turkey finisher (British United Turkeys), and leghorn prelay (ISA) and peak (Hy-Line) diets. Costs were local market prices in Pakistan (June 2010) and average US prices (2009). Formula costs were higher using the ED digestible amino acid values, ranging from $1.00/ton for the turkey finisher diet to $8.40/ton for the turkey starter diet. The broiler starter and finisher diets were $6.20 and $2.60/ton higher using the ED digestible amino acid values. Differences in formulation costs were due to higher levels of supplemental amino acids and soybean meal when using the ED database. The shadow prices of distillers dried grains with solubles ranged from $199.50/ton in the turkey starter diet, with AH digestible amino acid values, to $266.20/ton in the leghorn prelay diet, with AH digestible amino acid values. Not knowing the digestible amino acid levels in feed ingredients or choosing inappropriate digestible amino acid values may result (at least) in inefficiencies averaging $3.00 to $4.00/ton of finished feed for broilers, layers, and turkeys (approximately $6.00 for starter feed and $3.00 for finisher feed). Comparative values are similar for dollars and rupees. Differences in feed costs from using the different digestibility values can give an estimate of potential savings (costs) from using one particular database vs. the other. The cost difference may be used to demonstrate the magnitude of research monies that should be dedicated to estimating amino acid digestibility values most accurately.
机译:这项研究表明,使用不同数据库值的可消化氨基酸含量如何影响肉鸡,蛋鸡和火鸡日粮的原料使用和饲料成本,最近美国和巴基斯坦的原料成本也是如此。配制了一系列饲料,以比较使用两个商业成分组成数据库的结果:味之素心脏地带(AH;公鸡测定值)和赢创德固赛(ED;雏鸡测定值)。成分组成矩阵基于NRC(1994)表,但可消化的氨基酸和蛋白质除外。需求包括肉鸡开胃料(Ross),肉鸡精加工器(Cobb),火鸡精制器(Nicholas),火鸡精制器(英国联合土耳其),来克亨鸡预包装(ISA)和高峰期(Hy-Line)饮食。成本为巴基斯坦当地市场价格(2010年6月)和美国平均价格(2009年)。使用ED的可消化氨基酸值,配方成本较高,从火鸡精饮食的$ 1.00 /吨到火鸡精饮食的$ 8.40 /吨。使用ED的可消化氨基酸值,肉鸡的日粮和肥育日粮分别提高了6.20美元和2.60美元/吨。配方成本的差异是由于使用ED数据库时补充氨基酸和豆粕含量较高所致。酒糟含可溶物的干粮的影子价格在火鸡开胃日粮中可消化的氨基酸值为199.50美元/吨,在来克霍恩预饲日粮中可消化的氨基酸值为266.20美元/吨。不知道饲料成分中的可消化氨基酸水平或选择不合适的可消化氨基酸值可能导致(至少)低效率,平均而言,肉鸡,蛋鸡和火鸡的平均饲料成本为每吨$ 3.00至$ 4.00(初学者饲料约$ 6.00,而初学者饲料约$ 3.00)整理器Feed)。美元和卢比的比较值相似。由于使用不同的消化率值而导致的饲料成本差异可以估算使用一个特定数据库与另一个数据库的潜在节省(成本)。成本差异可用于证明研究经费的规模,该研究经费应致力于最准确地估算氨基酸消化率值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号