首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery: Official Journal of the International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery >Trimodality treatment versus surgery alone for esophageal cancer. A stratified analysis with minimally invasive pretreatment staging.
【24h】

Trimodality treatment versus surgery alone for esophageal cancer. A stratified analysis with minimally invasive pretreatment staging.

机译:三联疗法与单纯手术治疗食管癌的比较。具有微创预处理分期的分层分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BACKGROUND: Accurate pretreatment staging of esophageal cancer (EC) is important in the evaluation and comparison of results of different treatment modalities. Few studies using minimally invasive staging techniques for this purpose have been reported. We previously demonstrated the usefulness of the thoracoscopic/laparoscopic (Ts/Ls) technique in pretreatment staging of EC. This study was conducted to evaluate the impact of trimodality based on pretreatment Ts/Ls staging diagnosis on EC. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed on 2 groups of EC patients. Group A (44 patients) underwent pretreatment Ts/Ls staging and had trimodality treatment. Preoperative therapy consisted of concurrent chemotherapy (5-FU + cisplatinum) and radiotherapy. Group B (33 patients) underwent surgery alone. The study focused on stratified comparison of patterns of recurrence and survival in different pretreatment surgical T, N, and TNM stage categories. RESULTS: The 3-year disease free survival of Group A was 40.8% with a median survival of 32.0 months, it was 43.6% with a median survival of 23.6 months in Group B. The difference was not significant (p=0.87). There was no difference in recurrence pattern between the 2 groups. Patients with squamous cell carcinoma in Group A had no local recurrence during the follow-up period while those in Group B had a high local recurrence rate of 40% (p<0.005). When stratified by T factor, patients with locally advanced T stage (T3-4) in Group A had a lower distant recurrence rate than their counterpart patients in Group B (9.1 vs 38.5%, p=0.03), they had a better survival but the difference was not significant (3-year disease free survival: 41.7 vs 17.9%, p=0.14). There were no significant differences in recurrence pattern and survival in different N categories and TNM stages between 2 groups. Multivariate analysis showed that only pretreatment surgical N status was an independent prognostic factor for the whole group (p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Pretreatment Ts/Ls staging can provide accurate staging information for EC patients. Trimodality treatment was successful in local control for patients with squamous cell carcinoma. It was effective in reducing distant recurrence and might prolong survival in patients with advanced T stages. Pretreatment lymph node status was the most important prognosticator regardless of treatment modality. Pretreatment pathological staging should be included in the future clinical trials on multimodality treatments in EC patients.
机译:背景:食管癌(EC)的准确的预处理分期对于评估和比较不同治疗方式的结果很重要。为此,很少有研究使用微创分期技术进行研究。我们先前证明了胸腔镜/腹腔镜(Ts / Ls)技术在EC的预处理阶段中的有用性。进行这项研究以评估基于预处理Ts / Ls分期诊断对EC的三峰形式的影响。方法:对两组EC患者进行回顾性研究。 A组(44例患者)接受了Ts / Ls预处理,并接受了三联疗法。术前治疗包括同时化疗(5-FU +顺铂)和放疗。 B组(33例)仅接受手术治疗。这项研究的重点是对不同的手术前T,N和TNM分期类别的复发和生存模式进行分层比较。结果:A组3年无病生存率为40.8%,中位生存期为32.0个月; B组为33.6%,中位生存期为23.6个月。差异无显着性(p = 0.87)。两组之间的复发模式无差异。随访期间,A组鳞状细胞癌患者无局部复发,而B组则有40%的高局部复发率(p <0.005)。当按T因子分层时,A组局部晚期T期(T3-4)患者的远处复发率低于B组(9.1 vs 38.5%,p = 0.03),他们的生存率更高,但差异不显着(3年无病生存率:41.7 vs 17.9%,p = 0.14)。两组之间在不同的N类和TNM分期中,复发模式和生存率均无显着差异。多因素分析显示,只有手术前的N状态是整个组的独立预后因素(p = 0.02)。结论:预处理Ts / Ls分期可以为EC患者提供准确的分期信息。三联疗法成功地治疗了鳞状细胞癌患者。它可有效减少远处复发,并可能延长晚期T期患者的生存期。不论治疗方式如何,治疗前的淋巴结状态是最重要的预后因素。未来对EC患者进行多式联运治疗的临床试验应包括治疗前的病理分期。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号