...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy >Comparative evaluation of two different methods of inoculum preparation for antifungal susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi.
【24h】

Comparative evaluation of two different methods of inoculum preparation for antifungal susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi.

机译:两种不同接种方法对丝状真菌抗真菌药敏试验的比较评价。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Two different methods of inoculum preparation for susceptibility testing were analysed. The first method was adjustment of inoculum size by haemocytometer counting. The second method was spectrophotometric adjustment at 530 nm. The reliability of both methods was assessed by colony counting. The overall agreement between colony counting and haemocytometer counts was 93.6%, and the intraclass coefficient correlation was 0.71 (P < 0.05). Pearson's correlation index between colony counts and optical density values was -0.059 (P > 0.05). Optical densities ranged between 0.01 and 1.2, showing less reproducibility than expected by the NCCLS M38-P standard. Haemocytometer counting is a more reliable method of inoculum preparation for antifungal susceptibility testing.
机译:分析了两种制备敏感性的接种物的方法。第一种方法是通过血球计数器计数来调整接种量。第二种方法是在530 nm处进行分光光度调整。通过菌落计数评估两种方法的可靠性。菌落计数与血细胞计数之间的总体一致性为93.6%,类内系数相关性为0.71(P <0.05)。菌落数与光密度值之间的Pearson相关指数为-0.059(P> 0.05)。光学密度在0.01到1.2之间,显示出比NCCLS M38-P标准预期的低再现性。血细胞计数是用于抗真菌药敏试验的接种物更可靠的制备方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号