首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of cardiovascular nursing >'Others Had Similar Problems and YouWere Not Alone' Evaluation of an Open-Group Mutual Aid Model Cardiac Rehabilitation
【24h】

'Others Had Similar Problems and YouWere Not Alone' Evaluation of an Open-Group Mutual Aid Model Cardiac Rehabilitation

机译:“其他人也有类似的问题,而且您不是一个人对开放团体互助模型心脏康复的评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Dealing with psychological and social issues is an important aspect of comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programs. Study aim: This study aims to evaluate the use of an open-group mutual aid model facilitated by a social worker and occupational therapist in a secondary prevention CR program. Method: A mixed-method study, using questionnaires, focus group data, and reflective interviews of group facilitators, was used to evaluate the program. Study findings: Key themes emerging from this study were (1) the need for provision of hope; (2) a desire for structure and support; (3) appreciation of support of fellow group participants; and (4) the need for individuals to review, process, and interpret their illness trajectory. Conclusions: In this single site study, an open-group model using a mutual aid model was acceptable and helpful as a method to facilitate adjustment after an acute cardiac event. Further evaluation of this approach using experimental methods is warranted.
机译:背景:处理心理和社会问题是全面的心脏康复(CR)计划的重要方面。研究目的:本研究旨在评估在二级预防CR计划中由社会工作者和职业治疗师促进的开放团体互助模式的使用。方法:采用问卷调查,焦点小组数据和小组主持人的反思访谈的混合方法研究来评估该计划。研究结果:这项研究出现的主要主题是:(1)提供希望的需求; (2)对结构和支持的渴望; (3)感谢小组参与者的支持; (4)个人需要审查,处理和解释其疾病轨迹。结论:在这项单点研究中,使用互助模型的开放组模型是可以接受的,并且可以作为促进急性心脏事件后调整的一种方法。必须使用实验方法对该方法进行进一步评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号