首页> 外文期刊>The journal of business law >After Whiten: Punitive Damages for Breath of contract in Canada
【24h】

After Whiten: Punitive Damages for Breath of contract in Canada

机译:怀特恩之后:加拿大违反合同的惩罚性赔偿

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Considerable doubt has been cast recently on the traditional view that exemplary or punitive damages have no place in the law of contract. In several cases, and especially in Kuddus v Chief Constable of Leicestershire Constabulary, the House of Lords has inched toward the position that punitive damages may be awarded, but has stopped short of fully embracing this principle. By contrast, the Supreme Court of Canada has now fully embraced it in several recent cases, and especially in Whiten v. Pilot Insurance Co, although the scope of its application remains unclear. It is still far from certain that punitive damages will be awarded for "pure" breach of contract between commercial parties of similar commercial experience and sophistication, rather even after Whiten it is still the case that such awards may be limited to situations where hurt feelings or damaged peace of mind are at stake, for example, in wrongful dismissal or insurance claim denial cases, respectively.
机译:最近,传统观念认为示范性或惩罚性赔偿在合同法中没有地位,这引起了极大的怀疑。在某些情况下,尤其是在Kuddus诉莱斯特郡警察局首席警察一案中,上议院朝着可以判处惩罚性赔偿的立场迈进了一步,但并没有完全接受这一原则。相比之下,加拿大最高法院现在已经在最近的几起案件中,特别是在Whiten诉Pilot Insurance Co.一案中完全接受了它,尽管其适用范围仍不清楚。对于具有类似商业经验和复杂程度的商业当事方之间的“纯粹”违反合同,是否判处惩罚性赔偿仍然是远远不能确定的,即使在怀特恩之后,此类赔偿仍然可能仅限于伤害感觉或例如,在不正确的解雇或拒绝保险索赔的案件中,心境受到损害的风险就很大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号