首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of hand surgery, European volume >Theopold C, Potter S, Dempsey M, O'Shaughnessy M. A randomised controlled trial of absorbable versus non-absorbable sutures for skin closure after open carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg Eur. 2012; 37: 350-3
【24h】

Theopold C, Potter S, Dempsey M, O'Shaughnessy M. A randomised controlled trial of absorbable versus non-absorbable sutures for skin closure after open carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg Eur. 2012; 37: 350-3

机译:Theopold C,Potter S,Dempsey M,O'ShaughnessyM。一项开放性腕管释放术后可吸收与不可吸收缝合线闭合皮肤的随机对照试验。 J Hand Surg Eur。 2012; 37:350-3

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

We appreciate Dr Freshwater's thoughtful comments and questions regarding our manuscript. In answer to his questions, Vicryl Rapide (Ethicon) is indeed more expensive (?6.72 per suture] than Novafil (Covidien; ?5.51 per suture). For the purpose of this study, our follow-up routine consisted of suture removal (in case of Novafil] at 2 weeks and a wound review, in case of Vicryl Rapide, as well as recording of the discomfort associated with sutures falling out spontaneously. This was followed by scar review at 6-8 weeks for both groups.
机译:我们感谢Freshwater博士对我们的稿件的周到评论和问题。为了回答他的问题,Vicryl Rapide(Ethicon)确实比Novafil(Covidien;每条缝合线5.51)昂贵(每条缝合线6.72欧元)。为了本研究的目的,我们的随访常规包括去除缝合线(在2周时进行伤口复查,在Vicryl Rapide情况下进行伤口复查,并记录与缝合线自然脱落相关的不适感,然后在6-8周时对两组进行瘢痕复查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号