首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of continuing education in the health professions >Analyzing Fallacies in Argumentation to Enhance Effectiveness of Educational Interventions: The Case of Care Providers' Arguments Against Using Professional Interpretation
【24h】

Analyzing Fallacies in Argumentation to Enhance Effectiveness of Educational Interventions: The Case of Care Providers' Arguments Against Using Professional Interpretation

机译:分析争论中的谬误,以提高教育干预的有效性:护理人员反对使用专业口译的争论案例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Introduction: Although research has shown that professional interpreters improve health care to patients who do not speak the same language as their care provider, care providers underuse professional interpretation services. To get more insight into the reasons of care providers to underuse professional interpreters, we studied fallacies in their arguments. Fallacies in reasoning may explain why care providers avoid changing their behavior even if they are aware of evidence in favor of such behavior.
机译:简介:尽管研究表明,专业口译员可以为使用不同语言的患者提供更好的医疗服务,但护理员却没有充分利用专业口译服务。为了更深入地了解护理提供者使用专业口译员的原因,我们研究了他们的谬论。推理上的谬论可以解释为什么护理提供者即使知道有证据支持改变这种行为,也避免改变他们的行为。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号