...
首页> 外文期刊>The journal of clinical hypertension. >Comparative efficacy and safety of combination aliskiren/amlodipine and amlodipine monotherapy in African Americans with stage 2 hypertension.
【24h】

Comparative efficacy and safety of combination aliskiren/amlodipine and amlodipine monotherapy in African Americans with stage 2 hypertension.

机译:阿利吉仑/氨氯地平和氨氯地平单药联合治疗在患有2期高血压的非洲裔美国人中的比较疗效和安全性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Initial multiple drug therapy for hypertension achieves greater and quicker reductions and higher blood pressure (BP) control rates than monotherapy. This 8-week, prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind study compared the efficacy and safety of the initial combination of aliskiren/amlodipine with amlodipine monotherapy in African Americans with stage 2 hypertension. After a 1- to 4-week washout, patients received aliskiren/amlodipine 150/5 mg or amlodipine 5 mg for 1 week and then were force-titrated to aliskiren/amlodipine 300/10 mg or amlodipine 10 mg for 7 weeks. At week 8, greater reductions in mean sitting systolic BP were obtained with aliskiren/amlodipine (n = 220) than with amlodipine (n = 223) (least squares mean change [standard error of the mean], -34.1 [1.14] mm Hg vs -28.9 [1.12] mm Hg; P<.001). Ambulatory and central BP measures were consistent with clinic BP findings, although these were conducted in a small subset of patients (n = 94 in ambulatory BP monitoring substudy and n = 136 for central BP). More patients achieved goal BP (<140/90 mm Hg) with aliskiren/amlodipine than with amlodipine at week 8 (57.3% vs 48.0%; P = .051). Both treatment groups had similar adverse event rates (35.0% and 32.7%, respectively). The most common adverse events were peripheral edema (7.7% with aliskiren/amlodipine and 9.0% with amlodipine), headache, fatigue, and nausea. The combination of aliskiren/amlodipine reduced peripheral, ambulatory, and central BP more than amlodipine alone with similar tolerability in African Americans with stage 2 hypertension.
机译:相对于单一疗法,用于高血压的最初的多种药物疗法实现了越来越快的降低和更高的血压(BP)控制率。这项为期8周的前瞻性,多中心,随机,双盲研究比较了阿利吉仑/氨氯地平与氨氯地平单一疗法在2期非裔美国人中联合使用的有效性和安全性。冲洗1至4周后,患者接受阿利吉仑/氨氯地平150/5 mg或氨氯地平5 mg治疗1周,然后用力滴定至阿利吉仑/氨氯地平300/10 mg或氨氯地平10 mg,治疗7周。在第8周,阿利吉仑/氨氯地平(n = 220)比氨氯地平(n = 223)的平均坐位收缩压降低幅度更大(最小二乘均数变化[均值的标准误],-34.1 [1.14] mm Hg vs -28.9 [1.12] mm Hg; P <.001)。动态和中央血压测量与临床BP结果一致,尽管这些是在一小部分患者中进行的(动态BP监测子研究中n = 94,中央BP n = 136)。在第8周时,使用阿利吉仑/氨氯地平的患者达到目标BP(<140/90 mm Hg)的比例高于氨氯地平(57.3%vs 48.0%; P = .051)。两个治疗组的不良事件发生率相似(分别为35.0%和32.7%)。最常见的不良事件是周围水肿(阿利吉仑/氨氯地平为7.7%,氨氯地平为9.0%),头痛,疲劳和恶心。阿利吉仑/氨氯地平联合用药比单独使用氨氯地平减少更多的外周,门诊和中枢BP耐受性,在患有2期高血压的非裔美国人中具有相似的耐受性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号