首页> 外文期刊>The journal of clinical hypertension. >Effects of pioglitazone and metformin fixed-dose combination therapy on cardiovascular risk markers of inflammation and lipid profile compared with pioglitazone and metformin monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes.
【24h】

Effects of pioglitazone and metformin fixed-dose combination therapy on cardiovascular risk markers of inflammation and lipid profile compared with pioglitazone and metformin monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes.

机译:与吡格列酮和二甲双胍单药治疗相比,吡格列酮和二甲双胍固定剂量联合治疗对炎症和血脂状况的心血管危险标志物的影响与2型糖尿病患者相比。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

. Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) treatment should not increase cardiovascular (CV) risk and at best could provide benefit beyond lowering glucose. Pioglitazone has demonstrated a favorable CV profile relative to other oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) in outcome and observational studies. This randomized, double-blind, parallel-group controlled study examined circulating biomarkers of CV risk in T2DM patients receiving a fixed-dose combination (FDC) of pioglitazone/metformin compared with the respective monotherapies. Patients with stable glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA(1c) ) for 3 months taking no OADs were treated with pioglitazone 15mg/metformin 850mg FDC twice daily (bid), pioglitazone 15mg bid, or metformin 850mg bid for 24 weeks. FDC and pioglitazone increased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol by 14.20% and 9.88%, respectively, vs an increase of 6.09% with metformin (P<.05, metformin vs FDC). Triglycerides decreased with all three treatments -5.95%, -5.54% and -1.78%, respectively; P=not significant). FDC and pioglitazone significantly decreased small low-density lipoprotein and increased large low-density lipoprotein particle concentrations. Reductions in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein were greater in the FDC and pioglitazone groups. Increases in adiponectin were significant in the FDC and pioglitazone groups (P<.0001 vs metformin). Overall, adverse events were not higher with the FDC. Thus, treatment with the FDC resulted in improved levels of CV biomarkers, which were better than or equal to monotherapy.
机译:。 2型糖尿病(T2DM)治疗不应增加心血管(CV)风险,充其量只能提供降低血糖以外的益处。在结果和观察研究中,吡格列酮已证明相对于其他口服降糖药(OAD)而言具有良好的CV曲线。这项随机,双盲,平行组对照研究检查了接受吡格列酮/二甲双胍固定剂量联合治疗(FDC)的T2DM患者与各自的单一疗法相比,其心血管风险的生物标志物。连续3个月没有OAD的稳定糖基化血红蛋白(HbA(1c))患者接受吡格列酮15mg /二甲双胍850mg FDC每日两次(出价),吡格列酮15mg每日两次或二甲双胍850mg每日两次治疗。 FDC和吡格列酮分别使高密度脂蛋白胆固醇增加了14.20%和9.88%,而二甲双胍增加了6.09%(P <.05,二甲双胍比FDC)。三种处理的甘油三酸酯均下降-5.95%,-5.54%和-1.78%; P =不重要)。 FDC和吡格列酮显着降低了小的低密度脂蛋白并增加了大的低密度脂蛋白颗粒浓度。在FDC和吡格列酮组中,高敏感性C反应蛋白的减少幅度更大。脂联素的增加在FDC和吡格列酮组中显着(P <.0001 vs二甲双胍)。总体而言,FDC的不良事件并不高。因此,用FDC进行治疗可提高CV生物标志物的水平,优于或等于单一疗法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号