...
首页> 外文期刊>The Inspectioneering Journal >AVOIDING 5 COMMON PITFALLS OF PRESSURE VESSEL THICKNESS MONITORING
【24h】

AVOIDING 5 COMMON PITFALLS OF PRESSURE VESSEL THICKNESS MONITORING

机译:避免5个常见压力容器厚度监控

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

One of the more common inspection monitoring programs for pressure vessels is to perform thickness measurement at Corrosion Monitoring Locations (CMLs) to allow monitoring of minimum thicknesses and provide estimates for corrosion rates. These minimum thicknesses and corrosion rates are critical in supporting risk based inspection techniques or in setting half-life prescriptive re-inspection intervals. I have previously documented the problems that can arise when performing thickness monitoring for piping in a series of articles published in Inspectioneering Journal from 2012-2013 1,2,3,4,5. It has been the author's experience when reviewing plant inspection data for pressure vessels in preparation for risk based inspection assessments that the quality of thickness data and corrosion rates for pressure vessels is often as much of a concern as piping thickness data. This article will outline the common pitfalls associated with the pressure vessel thickness monitoring process and provide recommendations on correcting these.
机译:压力容器最常见的检查监视程序之一是在腐蚀监视位置(CML)进行厚度测量,以允许监视最小厚度并提供腐蚀速率的估计值。这些最小的厚度和腐蚀速率对于支持基于风险的检查技术或设置半衰期规定的重新检查间隔至关重要。我以前曾在2012-2013年1,2,3,4,5的《 Inspectioneering Journal》上发表的一系列文章中记录了对管道进行厚度监测时可能出现的问题。作者的经验是,在审查压力容器的工厂检查数据以进行基于风险的检查评估时,压力容器的厚度数据和腐蚀速率的质量通常与管道厚度数据一样重要。本文将概述与压力容器厚度监控过程相关的常见陷阱,并提供纠正这些陷阱的建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号