...
首页> 外文期刊>The International Forestry Review >Estimating opportunity costs of avoided deforestation (REDD): application of a flexible stepwise approach to the Indonesian pulp sector. (Special Issue: REDD and the evolution of an international forest regime.)
【24h】

Estimating opportunity costs of avoided deforestation (REDD): application of a flexible stepwise approach to the Indonesian pulp sector. (Special Issue: REDD and the evolution of an international forest regime.)

机译:估计避免森林砍伐(REDD)的机会成本:在印尼纸浆行业应用灵活的逐步方法。 (特刊:REDD和国际森林制度的演变。)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Developing countries are expected to contribute to climate change mitigation efforts by reducing deforestation, with financial compensations for associated economic losses. These losses are due to foregone revenues and limited economic development, all of these labelled "opportunity costs". Their accurate estimation is strategic for at least two reasons: to determine fair compensations, and to prioritize low cost strategies to reduce emissions. However, numerous interpretations of the opportunity cost concept coexist in the literature and in influential reports (e.g. Stern review), with differing estimated values for similar cases. This paper presents a framework to better identify relevant values to the calculations: profits/total national economic value, conservation site/downstream industries. When applied to the pulp sector in Indonesia, the framework yields contrasted opportunity costs. This contrast is due to several factors, including the heterogeneity of the pulp industry, or the availability of non-forested lands to displace activities. These values range from zero to one thousand dollars per hectare per year. To use such a framework would help gain credibility and achieve fairness in negotiations between host countries and other stakeholders, in particular those who fund activities to reduce deforestation.
机译:预计发展中国家将通过减少砍伐森林和相关经济损失的财政补偿,为减轻气候变化的努力做出贡献。这些损失归因于已放弃的收入和有限的经济发展,所有这些都标记为“机会成本”。他们的准确估算具有战略意义,原因至少有两个:确定公平补偿,以及优先考虑降低排放的低成本战略。但是,关于机会成本概念的多种解释共存于文献和有影响力的报告中(例如,斯特恩审查),并且类似案例的估计值也不同。本文提出了一个框架,可以更好地确定计算的相关价值:利润/国民经济总价值,保护区/下游产业。当应用于印度尼西亚的纸浆部门时,该框架产生了机会成本对比。这种对比是由于多种因素造成的,包括制浆业的异质性或非林地替代活动的土地的可用性。这些价值从每年每公顷零美元到一千美元不等。使用这样一个框架将有助于在东道国与其他利益攸关方,特别是那些为减少森林砍伐活动提供资金的利益攸关方之间的谈判中赢得信誉并实现公平。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号